Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The enormous amount of inequality in my marriage - financial, me doing all the grunt work, and him feeling too superior to do that because it isn't what a master of the universe does - definitely makes me not want to have sex with DH.
+1
I was specifically told that because I made less money I was responsible for ALL of the household chores as well as at least 50% of childcare.
I didn't want to have sex with his sexist a$$.
How much less money? If it's a 51/49 split, that's clearly unreasonable. If it's 90/10, that division doesn't seem too far off.
In any event, the best I ever see from women who think their husband does too little is "Maybe" if he did more, I'd want to have sex. My guess is that the unspoken "maybe not" side of that equation is more likely.
It matters because, if she's not making much money but is is spending a lot of hours on that job, then the family's over all labor pool isn't being allocated efficiently. She can shift her effort from work to home without that big of a hit to income.
Why does the income division matter? We both work full time, similar hours, and in a marriage earn money together. However, he never pulled his weight at home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The enormous amount of inequality in my marriage - financial, me doing all the grunt work, and him feeling too superior to do that because it isn't what a master of the universe does - definitely makes me not want to have sex with DH.
In our household, I do the work and DH gets to criticize and second-guess everything, thus I can take no real responsibility for anything. This includes all the so-called male tasks I do such as home repair and improvement, handling the finances and investments, etc.: I do it all, and it all subject to his detailed scrutiny and pending his approval. Guess whether we have sex? The one area I exercised my veto power, going on 3 years now.
Anonymous wrote:I think the article is stupid. The whole thing can be explained by the fact that men that do their fair share of work are as tired as women always are. quote]
Honestly, my husband and I read the article, and that was our first reaction--if both people are working and pulling their share of household chores and childcare, then both people are tired. Ergo, less sex. He also pointed out that having a kid reduces his gym time, and that negatively affects his sleep quality.
Anonymous wrote:How infrequent is a problem? It's going to be different for every couple. Personally, I think the one who wants it least just has to realize it's important to keeping a marriage strong and just treat it like a chore and offer at least once or twice a week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The enormous amount of inequality in my marriage - financial, me doing all the grunt work, and him feeling too superior to do that because it isn't what a master of the universe does - definitely makes me not want to have sex with DH.
+1
I was specifically told that because I made less money I was responsible for ALL of the household chores as well as at least 50% of childcare.
I didn't want to have sex with his sexist a$$.
How much less money? If it's a 51/49 split, that's clearly unreasonable. If it's 90/10, that division doesn't seem too far off.
In any event, the best I ever see from women who think their husband does too little is "Maybe" if he did more, I'd want to have sex. My guess is that the unspoken "maybe not" side of that equation is more likely.
It matters because, if she's not making much money but is is spending a lot of hours on that job, then the family's over all labor pool isn't being allocated efficiently. She can shift her effort from work to home without that big of a hit to income.
Why does the income division matter? We both work full time, similar hours, and in a marriage earn money together. However, he never pulled his weight at home.
Anonymous wrote:The enormous amount of inequality in my marriage - financial, me doing all the grunt work, and him feeling too superior to do that because it isn't what a master of the universe does - definitely makes me not want to have sex with DH.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not this again ...
As long as dependable, helpful husbands aren't getting laid while irresponsible douchebags are, this is going to keep coming up.
Anonymous wrote:I think the article is stupid. The whole thing can be explained by the fact that men that do their fair share of work are as tired as women always are. And face it, it is easier for women to have sex when they are tired than it is for men to. Men need at least some energy to have sex. Women don't.