Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I have a interview at a federal agency for a editor position (GS 13).
This is a joke... right?
lol
Why would it be a joke? You think an editor shouldn't be a GS 13?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I have a interview at a federal agency for a editor position (GS 13).
This is a joke... right?
lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I have a interview at a federal agency for a editor position (GS 13).
This is a joke... right?
Anonymous wrote:Actually, I know it still matters to some older men (who are often the ones doing the interview). You don't see people caring as much in the federal government, but when I was in private practice (BigLaw firm), I think the older partners would've either consciously or subconsciously let it affect their impressions of the job candidate.
Anonymous wrote: I have a interview at a federal agency for a editor position (GS 13).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank goodness times have changed. I remember when women on the hill were required to wear navy skirts and pantyhose (and even those crazy collar "dickies"). We do have Hillary to thank for this.
Actually, I believe we have Senator Mikulski to thank. I am pretty sure she was the first woman to wear a pant suit on the Senate floor.
Anonymous wrote:Thank goodness times have changed. I remember when women on the hill were required to wear navy skirts and pantyhose (and even those crazy collar "dickies"). We do have Hillary to thank for this.