Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The stories you hear about single moms with criminal kids are not-so-thinly veiled racist critiques of poverty. I'm divorced, live in a small apartment with a child in public school. We don't have a ton of money for amenities, but we are not "poor" by the hand-wringing definitions. More money is not going to help a person who does not know how to manage money. I grew up poor, so I have a lot of "poor skills" as my mom called them. If my monthly income doubled (currently around $3500 after taxes and health insurance), I would get a bigger living space, but that's about it. I might hire a house cleaner a couple of times a month, but honestly, if that was a priority, I could probably do that NOW. I'd save more, which would make a difference later but wouldn't change the day to day reality that the majority of things that happen, good and not so good, are on my watch and are my responsibility to respond to. Sometimes that's DD having a great day and being utterly delightful, and sometimes that's her waking up with a stomach bug and puking all over everything.
What this poster said. I have been broke (on welfare, etc), but I had the skills to manage money and the education, support and luck to work my way out of it. I no longer have to make the kinds of decisions that I made when DS was tiny (gas for work or groceries for dinner?). More money would help now, yes. But it wouldn't make a huge difference in our day-to-day lives. I'd be able to save for college, or buy a car so I wouldn't have to do Zipcar and Metro everywhere. I make just under $60K, so a bump to $100K would relieve stress, but nothing like the bump from $22K to $58K did. Doubling my income now would make my life more convenient and relaxed, but it wouldn't change the basics.
I used to be afraid of screwing DS up (esp after XH disappeared) because of all those articles and stories about fatherless boys. Then I realized that even if I was on food stamps, I was still middle-class and educated and would be raising my child with those values, I wouldn't be fighting against generations of cyclical poverty and stereotypes. I had society and institutional knowledge to help me out, I had a family who could step in, strong male role models for DS, etc. I was never POOR, merely really really BROKE. There's a big difference.
Anonymous wrote:The stories you hear about single moms with criminal kids are not-so-thinly veiled racist critiques of poverty. I'm divorced, live in a small apartment with a child in public school. We don't have a ton of money for amenities, but we are not "poor" by the hand-wringing definitions. More money is not going to help a person who does not know how to manage money. I grew up poor, so I have a lot of "poor skills" as my mom called them. If my monthly income doubled (currently around $3500 after taxes and health insurance), I would get a bigger living space, but that's about it. I might hire a house cleaner a couple of times a month, but honestly, if that was a priority, I could probably do that NOW. I'd save more, which would make a difference later but wouldn't change the day to day reality that the majority of things that happen, good and not so good, are on my watch and are my responsibility to respond to. Sometimes that's DD having a great day and being utterly delightful, and sometimes that's her waking up with a stomach bug and puking all over everything.
Anonymous wrote:It's odd to me that the focus is on what's easier rather than what's best. For example, sure, it's easier when only one person has to make decisions but wouldn't it be just as accurate to say that it's harder when it's only one person because the weight of that decision is on your shoulders as compared to having two people where there's at least some balancing some opinions to arrive at the best result?
I realize this is going to vary by situation and yeah, obviously it's better to not be in an abusive situation. Anyways, this isn't meant to be antagonistic but I think it helps to ask the tough questions about why we think the way we do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's odd to me that the focus is on what's easier rather than what's best. For example, sure, it's easier when only one person has to make decisions but wouldn't it be just as accurate to say that it's harder when it's only one person because the weight of that decision is on your shoulders as compared to having two people where there's at least some balancing some opinions to arrive at the best result?
I realize this is going to vary by situation and yeah, obviously it's better to not be in an abusive situation. Anyways, this isn't meant to be antagonistic but I think it helps to ask the tough questions about why we think the way we do.
Anonymous wrote:It's odd to me that the focus is on what's easier rather than what's best. For example, sure, it's easier when only one person has to make decisions but wouldn't it be just as accurate to say that it's harder when it's only one person because the weight of that decision is on your shoulders as compared to having two people where there's at least some balancing some opinions to arrive at the best result?
I realize this is going to vary by situation and yeah, obviously it's better to not be in an abusive situation. Anyways, this isn't meant to be antagonistic but I think it helps to ask the tough questions about why we think the way we do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's odd to me that the focus is on what's easier rather than what's best. For example, sure, it's easier when only one person has to make decisions but wouldn't it be just as accurate to say that it's harder when it's only one person because the weight of that decision is on your shoulders as compared to having two people where there's at least some balancing some opinions to arrive at the best result?
I realize this is going to vary by situation and yeah, obviously it's better to not be in an abusive situation. Anyways, this isn't meant to be antagonistic but I think it helps to ask the tough questions about why we think the way we do.
If you are co-parenting with someone who is working with you from a foundation of good will then it's a lot better to have two people sharing those decisions and burdens. But when the other parent makes every decision hell because that's their way of life, it's a lot harder. A LOT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:cracked.com -- a content mill product.
Which makes it automatically invalid because ...
Anonymous wrote:cracked.com -- a content mill product.