Anonymous wrote:Why cater to the kids preferences so much? Just make a meal for the family and sit down to eat it together. If the kid throws the food, then the meal is over. If they eat, then fine. If not, then also fine. At the next meal they will be hungry and maybe more willing to try something. Or the next meal. By 20 months, there is no reason to be giving purees or any other special "kid" foods. When the kids understand that those items are no longer on the menu and that there will be no special fussing about what they eat or don't' eat, they will manage to eat what they need to grow and thrive.
And people like to say its all ok unless they go off their growth curve. That often seems wrong to me. One of my kids was 95th percentile for weight at birth. I am sure glad he gradually adjusted down in the growth chart curve, since its not the best health for most kids to be at 95th percentile when they're 2 or 3. Kids do normally adjust their position in the chart as they grow, especially in the first year or 2.
Anonymous wrote:Op here: the problem with offering her a few things she likes and just a bunch of things all at once, is if I offer chicken nuggets, green beans, and melon, she will eat the melon. and that's it. i usually give melon last for that reason because once she has it there's no WAY she's touching anything else. but if i offer chicken nuggets and green beans, she may just refuse the whole meal and that's when I end up taking out the fruit and yogurt
Anonymous wrote:DD after 13M decided to be uber picky and the whole strategy of putting a variety of foods in front of her and the option of if she doesn't eat she'll be hungry and then eat is a joke. PP - She went 24 hrs without eating one day - was I supposed to starve her for another? That's a stupid tactic that doesn't work with all kids. With food, you gotta work with the kid. In matters of health I would not compromise as long as what she will eat is healthy. May suck for me to cater to her but I'm not having her sick.