Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the scammers who end up causing the genuinely hungry the most harm. It not only takes away precious resources from the hungry, it also makes those who can help and who otherwise would want to help turn away.
It's a big deal. It's something that seriously needs to be dealt with.
People who turn away from children in need because of these concerns need to take responsibility for their own decision to ignore children in need.
Oh, so those of us who work, who feed our own kids, who already contribute so much are the ones who have to take responsibility for feeding hungry children, but scammers and deadbeats get a free pass. I see. Thanks for clarifying that.
You wonder why many people push back? It's because of bullshit like this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the scammers who end up causing the genuinely hungry the most harm. It not only takes away precious resources from the hungry, it also makes those who can help and who otherwise would want to help turn away.
It's a big deal. It's something that seriously needs to be dealt with.
People who turn away from children in need because of these concerns need to take responsibility for their own decision to ignore children in need.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the scammers who end up causing the genuinely hungry the most harm. It not only takes away precious resources from the hungry, it also makes those who can help and who otherwise would want to help turn away.
It's a big deal. It's something that seriously needs to be dealt with.
People who turn away from children in need because of these concerns need to take responsibility for their own decision to ignore children in need.
Anonymous wrote:I doubt starving families sit around on DCUM.
OP is clueless.
Anonymous wrote:No. But my sons best friend does. I fed him 2 meals today. I feed him about 10 meals a week. It takes a village.
Anonymous wrote:It's the scammers who end up causing the genuinely hungry the most harm. It not only takes away precious resources from the hungry, it also makes those who can help and who otherwise would want to help turn away.
It's a big deal. It's something that seriously needs to be dealt with.
Anonymous wrote:No. But my sons best friend does. I fed him 2 meals today. I feed him about 10 meals a week. It takes a village.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are families in DC that expect a lot of freebies.
There are families in DC that are incapable of planning ahead to pack a sandwich for their kid.
There are a lot of people in this town who are a total mess.
There are also a lot of douchey commenters on DCUM.
The feeling is mutual.
Yes, there are poor folks in DC but there are also a lot of deadbeats who don't bother to help themselves or their kids, who live to scam the system. That's a fact. Pull your head out of your ass.
Anonymous wrote:No. But my sons best friend does. I fed him 2 meals today. I feed him about 10 meals a week. It takes a village.
Anonymous wrote:No. But my sons best friend does. I fed him 2 meals today. I feed him about 10 meals a week. It takes a village.