Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our experience with the DC 529 was that the performance was awful, saw a huge difference between the DC fund and money we had in a Nevada Vanguard 529. Moved all the money from DC to the Nevada fund and have been very happy.
Performance in 2013 was great. 25 percent or so return.
Anonymous wrote:Our experience with the DC 529 was that the performance was awful, saw a huge difference between the DC fund and money we had in a Nevada Vanguard 529. Moved all the money from DC to the Nevada fund and have been very happy.
Anonymous wrote:There was another thread on this recently with a lot of good info about the tax benefits (DC taxes) of the DC plan. It's up to $4000 per parent per kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I forget the specifics because we did the research years ago, but I believe at some income level, there is no tax advantage to use the DC fund. That is why we went with Utah.
There isn't an income limit for the DC deduction, so I don't think this is true. It is true that at some investment level, the icnreased fee would swamp the tax benefit.
If you were in a very low income bracket (eg if you were a single-income military family receiving combat pay, which is untaxed), maybe the deduction wouldn't help you that much?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I forget the specifics because we did the research years ago, but I believe at some income level, there is no tax advantage to use the DC fund. That is why we went with Utah.
There isn't an income limit for the DC deduction, so I don't think this is true. It is true that at some investment level, the icnreased fee would swamp the tax benefit.
Anonymous wrote:I forget the specifics because we did the research years ago, but I believe at some income level, there is no tax advantage to use the DC fund. That is why we went with Utah.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know but the issue was at what point the fees outweigh the tax benefit
529 fees by state -
http://www.savingforcollege.com/529_fee_study/