Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:10:58: You hit the nail squarely on the head!!!! Time for Henderson to be shown the door.
So leave Dunbar "as is"?!?... b/c they're doing such an outstanding job currently.![]()
Sadly, Dunbar's current student population is pretty much what's left over after every motivated family has self-selected out. Short of miracles, I'm not sure there's much that the teachers can do at this point. It is the downside of school choice.
You do realize that if those motivated families didn't have a choice within DC, large numbers would get out of DC altogether, right? It's not as if Dunbar would be A ok if only there was no school choice. DC had that scenario already and it was not ok
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some other interesting data - the new Dunbar building has a capacity, I believe, of 1,100 students. There are about 500 enrolled (as of 2012-13 school year). Of the 500 enrolled, fewer than half (46%) are in-boundary.
As it stands right now, there's room for a sort of 50/50 solution. Word in the neighborhood is that the new Dunbar is Gray's pet project, so I'll be interested to see how the autonomy discussion develops.
So lovely to know they spent 122 million on a school that is less than 50% capacity.... with 17% at or above grade level for high school. What a joke...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:10:58: You hit the nail squarely on the head!!!! Time for Henderson to be shown the door.
So leave Dunbar "as is"?!?... b/c they're doing such an outstanding job currently.![]()
Sadly, Dunbar's current student population is pretty much what's left over after every motivated family has self-selected out. Short of miracles, I'm not sure there's much that the teachers can do at this point. It is the downside of school choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well then, what about a test-in academy at Dunbar? No neighborhood kids excluded from the school, some will test in to the academy and be joined by strong students from around the city. And perhaps with autonomy, an experienced administrator could hire excellent teachers and find success in all areas of the school.
If the school still has lots of behavioral problems, then a test-in academy within the school will have a hard time attracting students. I know I would never send my kid that has a lot of severe behavioral issues even with a test-in academy.
It seems to work for Blair, and that school have multiple NMS every year. PP, private school is what you seek.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Epic failure of DCPS. Fail to educate children in elementary school. These kids then go to very sub-par middle schools and now let's exclude those kids from attending most of the public high schools in DC.
And then we can blame the bureaucracy that we put in place.
When will someone stand up for the children of DC?
That's the only way we can improve test scores, because Rhee/Henderson/TFA/Charter Schools et al said it is ALL the teachers fault. Before you get voted out of DC you have to show some results.
Get those fresh out of "the best and the brightest" universities and give them 5 weeks training and a teaching certificate and test scores will rise!!!! When that doesn't work manipulate the test scores, open a multitude of charter schools to drain all the top talent, threaten the teachers and stress them out and fire the bottom x percent every year (Rhee documented tactic), control the media (Washington Post). Well all else fails bring in an outside agency to turn around your school with NO oversight (Friends of Bedford). Still failing, make your school an application school and fool all those around you by blowing lots of smoke and surround yourself with mirrors. When you read most of the posts on DCUM about failing or title I schools, their tactics apparently appear to be working well!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well then, what about a test-in academy at Dunbar? No neighborhood kids excluded from the school, some will test in to the academy and be joined by strong students from around the city. And perhaps with autonomy, an experienced administrator could hire excellent teachers and find success in all areas of the school.
If the school still has lots of behavioral problems, then a test-in academy within the school will have a hard time attracting students. I know I would never send my kid that has a lot of severe behavioral issues even with a test-in academy.
Anonymous wrote:Epic failure of DCPS. Fail to educate children in elementary school. These kids then go to very sub-par middle schools and now let's exclude those kids from attending most of the public high schools in DC.
And then we can blame the bureaucracy that we put in place.
When will someone stand up for the children of DC?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:10:58: You hit the nail squarely on the head!!!! Time for Henderson to be shown the door.
So leave Dunbar "as is"?!?... b/c they're doing such an outstanding job currently.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:10:58: You hit the nail squarely on the head!!!! Time for Henderson to be shown the door.
So leave Dunbar "as is"?!?... b/c they're doing such an outstanding job currently.![]()
Anonymous wrote:10:58: You hit the nail squarely on the head!!!! Time for Henderson to be shown the door.
Anonymous wrote:Some other interesting data - the new Dunbar building has a capacity, I believe, of 1,100 students. There are about 500 enrolled (as of 2012-13 school year). Of the 500 enrolled, fewer than half (46%) are in-boundary.
As it stands right now, there's room for a sort of 50/50 solution. Word in the neighborhood is that the new Dunbar is Gray's pet project, so I'll be interested to see how the autonomy discussion develops.