Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suppose I have a dissenting opinion. Clearly, seeing your family is important for your in-laws. It seems to be important for your husband as well. It is a pretty reasonable position. Kids grow and change tremendously in a year. In this particular case, I think FAMILY TRUMPS MONEY.
Now, you can be financially responsible about visiting. If you feel so uncomfortable about accepting help, or embarrassed to air your financial circumstances, then the onus is on you to find a way to make visiting happen WITHOUT GOING INTO DEBT. Cut cable, stop eating out/ordering in, only shop at thrift stores, sell a car, etc.
YOU were the one who made the poor financial decisions earlier. Don't punish your in-laws for your mistakes. Find a way to save that money. Your choices are not just to accept a handout or go into debt. Where there's a will, there's a way. Sounds like you just don't want to find a way.
Oh, PP, if only it was that easy. We haven't had cable since 2010, we don't eat out, and although I don't have time to shop at thrift stores, we buy our kids' clothes very cheaply. We have a lot of student loan debt (over $300k) and that is why we are so poor. It's not something that can be undone or helped by trimming around the edges. And actually, my in-laws encouraged DH and cosigned all his loans. So, from that perspective, they aren't completely blameless.
Anonymous wrote:I suppose I have a dissenting opinion. Clearly, seeing your family is important for your in-laws. It seems to be important for your husband as well. It is a pretty reasonable position. Kids grow and change tremendously in a year. In this particular case, I think FAMILY TRUMPS MONEY.
Now, you can be financially responsible about visiting. If you feel so uncomfortable about accepting help, or embarrassed to air your financial circumstances, then the onus is on you to find a way to make visiting happen WITHOUT GOING INTO DEBT. Cut cable, stop eating out/ordering in, only shop at thrift stores, sell a car, etc.
YOU were the one who made the poor financial decisions earlier. Don't punish your in-laws for your mistakes. Find a way to save that money. Your choices are not just to accept a handout or go into debt. Where there's a will, there's a way. Sounds like you just don't want to find a way.
Anonymous wrote:Can't you just say you are coming and then claim a major issue at work is preventing you? That's what I'd do. You "sve face", and the excuse is at least reasonable (even if untrue).
Anonymous wrote:OP, if it is only the cost that bothers you, I would graciously accept the aid and go. Its possible you are projecting due to your own financial stress. To many people $2-3k is not a big deal. It is easy to imagine that your ILs would more than happily pay your way for the pleasure of your company.
Personally, I would find your MIL's inability to accept "no" to be aggravating, intrusive, and what have you. You should be allowed to opt out! Especially since you are not doing it for frivolous reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, you should never borrow for a vacation but that was not the issue you raised in the last thread. Perhaps I read it wrong, but I thought your ILs want to pay for your trip-or at least they have in the past- so the whole family can get together. If you have the vacation time and this is a priority for your ILs I'm not sure why you are stressing about it so much. It also sounds like you accept financial assistance from your family without an issue. It sounds like something else is going on here.
OP here. What connects the two threads is that we (read: I -- DH would probably just charge the credit card if I wasn't the one to put the kibosh on it) are the only family who will admit to not being able to afford the trip. If anyone else couldn't, they would never say so and just quietly go into debt ... so we look tacky and cheap by admitting our situation and trying to do the right thing for the good of our family. This is one of a few aspects of this situation that I find frustrating.
If they would just take "we can't come this year" for an answer I would be so much less stressed. We tried promising to come every other year (so we could save up) and that wasn't good enough for them. DH has suggested waiting until the last minute to tell them we can't come next year so they won't have time to force it, but I doubt that will work because my MIL will be hounding us about it six months in advance.
Money is the biggest source of stress in my life, no doubt. I am embarrassed about our situation and feel a lot of regret about decisions I made years ago that are having repercussions now. This trip causes stress because it is the only major instance where we are asked (demanded) by others to spend money we don't have. There are other things like fundraisers where we may be asked for smaller amounts, but we can elect not to participate without being called out. We can forgo family vacations, decline birthday invitations, sell belongings or pull a child out of preschool if need be and that is all our business. The expectation that we will spend $2-3k per year on this trip forces us into a Hobson's choice of poor mouthing to the whole family or going into (more) debt.
Anonymous wrote:I suppose I have a dissenting opinion. Clearly, seeing your family is important for your in-laws. It seems to be important for your husband as well. It is a pretty reasonable position. Kids grow and change tremendously in a year. In this particular case, I think FAMILY TRUMPS MONEY.
Now, you can be financially responsible about visiting. If you feel so uncomfortable about accepting help, or embarrassed to air your financial circumstances, then the onus is on you to find a way to make visiting happen WITHOUT GOING INTO DEBT. Cut cable, stop eating out/ordering in, only shop at thrift stores, sell a car, etc.
YOU were the one who made the poor financial decisions earlier. Don't punish your in-laws for your mistakes. Find a way to save that money. Your choices are not just to accept a handout or go into debt. Where there's a will, there's a way. Sounds like you just don't want to find a way.
Anonymous wrote:I suppose I have a dissenting opinion. Clearly, seeing your family is important for your in-laws. It seems to be important for your husband as well. It is a pretty reasonable position. Kids grow and change tremendously in a year. In this particular case, I think FAMILY TRUMPS MONEY.
Now, you can be financially responsible about visiting. If you feel so uncomfortable about accepting help, or embarrassed to air your financial circumstances, then the onus is on you to find a way to make visiting happen WITHOUT GOING INTO DEBT. Cut cable, stop eating out/ordering in, only shop at thrift stores, sell a car, etc.
YOU were the one who made the poor financial decisions earlier. Don't punish your in-laws for your mistakes. Find a way to save that money. Your choices are not just to accept a handout or go into debt. Where there's a will, there's a way. Sounds like you just don't want to find a way.