That is how the system is set up.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing, at 18, the kids are adults. It should depend on the child's relationship with the parent (s) and their willingness to pay. Married parents are not required to pay, so divorced should not be either.
So if you don't like your kids the don't get to go to college?
Anonymous wrote:15:21 To posters who do not understand how divorce changes a parent's commitment to cover college, it's one of many, many things divorce can change. This is truly an area that depends on the will of the parent. And yes, the willingness to cover can change over time, due to a number of things. Financial woes, remarriage, a sense of being screwed by the original financial settlement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems weird to me that people assume their ex (of either gender I suppose) would change their approach to wanting to pay for college due to the divorce. The divorce certainly diminishes the household resources so maybe there's just less money available to contribute but that could happen if they stayed married and one parent lost their job. Or is it the remarriage thing and one choosing to devote their financial resources to the new family to the exclusion of the old? Just doesn't make sense to me.
I'm not sure where you got that this is a change.
OP here, my ex has always said he would pay for college, but now that he has a legal document he doesn't want to. Which tells me, he doesn't want to pay for college but keeps up the charade to look like a good Father to other people.
I meant the comment more generally as I was having a hard time keeping track of the different posters. But, since you mention it, your situation seems odd to me. I mean, you're married for X number of years during which presumably you discussed whether the two of you would pay for college so I assume if you had stayed married household resources would be used to pay for college. I just don't understand why the divorce would change that one way or the other except to some degree to reflect a reduction in resources. It's really an open-ended question as to why someone would decide after the divorce that they don't want to pay for college and also why someone would, assuming the original plan in the marriage that the kids would be on their own for college, decide to change things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems weird to me that people assume their ex (of either gender I suppose) would change their approach to wanting to pay for college due to the divorce. The divorce certainly diminishes the household resources so maybe there's just less money available to contribute but that could happen if they stayed married and one parent lost their job. Or is it the remarriage thing and one choosing to devote their financial resources to the new family to the exclusion of the old? Just doesn't make sense to me.
I'm not sure where you got that this is a change.
OP here, my ex has always said he would pay for college, but now that he has a legal document he doesn't want to. Which tells me, he doesn't want to pay for college but keeps up the charade to look like a good Father to other people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ex is paying for the equivalent of in-state tuition for our two children for a total of four years each, provided they keep above a "C" average. In exchange, I let go of all my rights to his pension and retirement accounts. Plenty of people said that I was crazy, but I knew what I wanted for my kids.
Thanks PP. My ex doesn't want anything in writing. I'm also giving up a lot for it, but I know this is mandatory. Was he unwilling to pay more than state tuition (eg private school).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generally schools don't just take kids' word for it that they are independent. (Lower cost or state schools may; expensive private schools don't.) Otherwise everyone would claim to be independent to get more financial aid from the school. Students often have to show legal proof that a parent is not contributing, letters from clergy or others, or something.
It was a huge hassle for me at the time - my dad made much more than my mom. He claimed he would help, but I knew that would never, ever happen and he would never have signed something saying he wouldn't be contributing. My financial aid package for nicer private schools always included a parental contribution that was utterly unrealistic.
(I went to a state school on a full ride, so no harm done.)
Question, do you resent your Father for not contributing?
I have managed to control my resentment, but maybe because I didn't end up with any undergraduate debt because of my scholarships. I was proud of working my way through, studying abroad multiple times, being summa cum laude, etc. And I don't come from more typical DCUM stock - I wasn't always surrounded by people with relatively high incomes like a lot of metro DC kids are.
I am resentful a bit now that I learned that my dad and his wife paid tuition and rent for my older stepsister (40-ish) when she decided to go back to school after dropping out in her early 20s. My dad said it was because she has kids she couldn't really support (post-divorce) without better job prospects. Cry me a river!
Funnily enough, I used to look down on people whose parents paid for everything (college, grad school, weddings, downpayments). I have more friends now that come from that kind of background, and in general I would say they ended up pretty grounded, normal, hardworking, etc. It didn't ruin them, and they don't have the stress I have of paying several hundred dollars a month for grad school loans or extra mortgage because I had to put down $0 on my little fixer-upper.
Anonymous wrote:Seems weird to me that people assume their ex (of either gender I suppose) would change their approach to wanting to pay for college due to the divorce. The divorce certainly diminishes the household resources so maybe there's just less money available to contribute but that could happen if they stayed married and one parent lost their job. Or is it the remarriage thing and one choosing to devote their financial resources to the new family to the exclusion of the old? Just doesn't make sense to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generally schools don't just take kids' word for it that they are independent. (Lower cost or state schools may; expensive private schools don't.) Otherwise everyone would claim to be independent to get more financial aid from the school. Students often have to show legal proof that a parent is not contributing, letters from clergy or others, or something.
It was a huge hassle for me at the time - my dad made much more than my mom. He claimed he would help, but I knew that would never, ever happen and he would never have signed something saying he wouldn't be contributing. My financial aid package for nicer private schools always included a parental contribution that was utterly unrealistic.
(I went to a state school on a full ride, so no harm done.)
Question, do you resent your Father for not contributing?
Anonymous wrote:Generally schools don't just take kids' word for it that they are independent. (Lower cost or state schools may; expensive private schools don't.) Otherwise everyone would claim to be independent to get more financial aid from the school. Students often have to show legal proof that a parent is not contributing, letters from clergy or others, or something.
It was a huge hassle for me at the time - my dad made much more than my mom. He claimed he would help, but I knew that would never, ever happen and he would never have signed something saying he wouldn't be contributing. My financial aid package for nicer private schools always included a parental contribution that was utterly unrealistic.
(I went to a state school on a full ride, so no harm done.)