Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adoption is an alternative route if having kids is the urgency.
Adoptions take years and tens of thousands of dollars to complete a successful one. Your chances of being chosen and being able to afford an adoption are lower if you're single.
I hate it when uninformed people make adoption sound like the panacea for women who are having trouble having biological kids because of age, fertility, relationships (or lack thereof), etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adoption is an alternative route if having kids is the urgency.
Adoptions take years and tens of thousands of dollars to complete a successful one. Your chances of being chosen and being able to afford an adoption are lower if you're single.
I hate it when uninformed people make adoption sound like the panacea for women who are having trouble having biological kids because of age, fertility, relationships (or lack thereof), etc.
Adoptions aren't for everyone, as you demonstrate with this comment. May the child in need who might have gone to you find a loving home.
Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure the references are for women who do not yet have children but have expressed wanting to have them, most likely biologically. Single moms by choice is, of course, an alternative route as you suggest, but the challenges such a choice entail can be daunting.
Anonymous wrote:Woman here. I agree, OP, thanks for the post. I have friends that think the window of opportunity for love closes at a certain date (see the "I don't want to date a woman over 40" thread) and you are right, that is a myth. There is no time limit to meet someone and be happy. But there is a time limit for kids, though. [/quote
Yes, but I think the goal should be finding a man or woman whom you genuinely love, whom you can see yourself spending your entire life with and growing old. If you both want kids, great! If you don't or can't have them, you can still be happy. Remember, if you want and are fortunate enough to have kids they are preprogrammed to leave you at a certain age. You will then be left with your spouse. You better want to be with them for the next 2- - 30 years!
This board seems so full of people who married the wrong spouse. I bet a lot of them were pressing for one to meet that biological deadline, and not necessarily someone who makes them happy!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think fertility concerns can be overblown - a 30 year old should not be panicking. But let's be serious - a woman who really wants a child is running out of time as she gets into her late 30s with no spouse. It is unfair for men not to recognize this.
I don't understand this last statement. How are men being unfair by not recognizing the limits of the biological clock? I think most men are aware of it.
I mean they are unfair to act like a woman is being "crazy" if she is getting anxious about her biological clock when dating. Plenty of late 30s guys still just want to screw around and act like a late 30s woman has something wrong with her if she tries to assess whether they are serious or not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adoption is an alternative route if having kids is the urgency.
Adoptions take years and tens of thousands of dollars to complete a successful one. Your chances of being chosen and being able to afford an adoption are lower if you're single.
I hate it when uninformed people make adoption sound like the panacea for women who are having trouble having biological kids because of age, fertility, relationships (or lack thereof), etc.
Adoptions aren't for everyone, as you demonstrate with this comment. May the child in need who might have gone to you find a loving home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think fertility concerns can be overblown - a 30 year old should not be panicking. But let's be serious - a woman who really wants a child is running out of time as she gets into her late 30s with no spouse. It is unfair for men not to recognize this.
I don't understand this last statement. How are men being unfair by not recognizing the limits of the biological clock? I think most men are aware of it.
I mean they are unfair to act like a woman is being "crazy" if she is getting anxious about her biological clock when dating. Plenty of late 30s guys still just want to screw around and act like a late 30s woman has something wrong with her if she tries to assess whether they are serious or not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think fertility concerns can be overblown - a 30 year old should not be panicking. But let's be serious - a woman who really wants a child is running out of time as she gets into her late 30s with no spouse. It is unfair for men not to recognize this.
I don't understand this last statement. How are men being unfair by not recognizing the limits of the biological clock? I think most men are aware of it.
Anonymous wrote:I think fertility concerns can be overblown - a 30 year old should not be panicking. But let's be serious - a woman who really wants a child is running out of time as she gets into her late 30s with no spouse. It is unfair for men not to recognize this.
Anonymous wrote:I think fertility concerns can be overblown - a 30 year old should not be panicking. But let's be serious - a woman who really wants a child is running out of time as she gets into her late 30s with no spouse. It is unfair for men not to recognize this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adoption is an alternative route if having kids is the urgency.
Adoptions take years and tens of thousands of dollars to complete a successful one. Your chances of being chosen and being able to afford an adoption are lower if you're single.
I hate it when uninformed people make adoption sound like the panacea for women who are having trouble having biological kids because of age, fertility, relationships (or lack thereof), etc.