Anonymous wrote:It seems silly to rank these since my kid has almost no chance of getting into any of them. The lottery is like a blind man throwing darts and hoping one actually lands somewhere on the board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will oyster still have in boundary this year?
Yes, of course. This year and next and for the foreseeable future. It is only a minority of the Oyster Adams community that would like to change things; the majority (and DCPS) are pretty happy to maintain such a successful and diverse model.
How can this be true if it is majority out of boundary to begin with that a majority of the school prizes the in boundary set up for a specialized school?
Because a majority of those OOB families want their kids to attend a school in a nice, affluent area...not in the hood. You can't remove the boundaries and leave Woodley Park without a neighborhood school. Oyster has been bilingual and on that same corner for over 40 years--nothing major is changing with those boundaries anytime soon. Plus, if there were no boundaries, those parents would still have to travel to WP to attend the school. The real reason some people want Oyster's boundaries abolished is that they resent that affluent families can buy their way into the neighborhood/school. In a word: envy.
In the latest survey the vast majorities of in-bound AND out-bound parents wanted the school to remain in the same locations. Why? I don't think it's so much that "hood" factor as much as:
- Why play with fire? If something is working well, why attempt something radical that might well mean the end of the school as a successful, bilingual and diverse institution?
- Everyone at the school already has work, life and transport arrangements in place. Out-boundary parents and teachers live all over the city, not just in one neighborhood, so for a very significant chunk of them moving the school somewhere farther away from current locations would make life much more difficult, not easier. They would be as affected as the in-bound parents and teachers, if not more
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always wonder why parents say Montessori isn't for their child. Do you have experience with the philosophy to test its effectiveness? I have no dog in the fight, just curious.
I know about Montessori b/c I have nieces and nephews who went. My child needs more structure and direction.
NP, this is very true. Even Montessori teachers will tell you, the model is not ideal for every child. Some kids are fine either way, some thrive, and some really require a more structured environment.
we used to send our kids to a Montessori school. while i fully believe that Montessori is NOT for every child, every Montessori teacher with whom i have spoken believe that Montessori is for every child.
Anonymous wrote:I always wonder why parents say Montessori isn't for their child. Do you have experience with the philosophy to test its effectiveness? I have no dog in the fight, just curious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always wonder why parents say Montessori isn't for their child. Do you have experience with the philosophy to test its effectiveness? I have no dog in the fight, just curious.
I know about Montessori b/c I have nieces and nephews who went. My child needs more structure and direction.
NP, this is very true. Even Montessori teachers will tell you, the model is not ideal for every child. Some kids are fine either way, some thrive, and some really require a more structured environment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always wonder why parents say Montessori isn't for their child. Do you have experience with the philosophy to test its effectiveness? I have no dog in the fight, just curious.
I know about Montessori b/c I have nieces and nephews who went. My child needs more structure and direction.
Anonymous wrote:I always wonder why parents say Montessori isn't for their child. Do you have experience with the philosophy to test its effectiveness? I have no dog in the fight, just curious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will oyster still have in boundary this year?
Yes, of course. This year and next and for the foreseeable future. It is only a minority of the Oyster Adams community that would like to change things; the majority (and DCPS) are pretty happy to maintain such a successful and diverse model.
How can this be true if it is majority out of boundary to begin with that a majority of the school prizes the in boundary set up for a specialized school?
Because a majority of those OOB families want their kids to attend a school in a nice, affluent area...not in the hood. You can't remove the boundaries and leave Woodley Park without a neighborhood school. Oyster has been bilingual and on that same corner for over 40 years--nothing major is changing with those boundaries anytime soon. Plus, if there were no boundaries, those parents would still have to travel to WP to attend the school. The real reason some people want Oyster's boundaries abolished is that they resent that affluent families can buy their way into the neighborhood/school. In a word: envy.