Anonymous wrote:I agree with the idea that Middle School grades should be aligned across the system. If kids are peeling off from DCPS ES to go to good charters, perhaps all the ES should stop at 4th grade. Or else, all middle schools should start at 6th grade.
The problem with the current system is that motivated parents are the ones who pull their students out of DCPS for charters in 5th grade, because of the lack of good DCPS middle school alternatives and the impossibility of getting into good charters at later grades. This makes the DCPS 5th grade population much smaller. This trend will just accelerate over time resulting in clearly under-populated 5th grades in ES that have no good MS to feed into.
Anonymous wrote:I agree with the idea that Middle School grades should be aligned across the system. If kids are peeling off from DCPS ES to go to good charters, perhaps all the ES should stop at 4th grade. Or else, all middle schools should start at 6th grade.
The problem with the current system is that motivated parents are the ones who pull their students out of DCPS for charters in 5th grade, because of the lack of good DCPS middle school alternatives and the impossibility of getting into good charters at later grades. This makes the DCPS 5th grade population much smaller. This trend will just accelerate over time resulting in clearly under-populated 5th grades in ES that have no good MS to feed into.
Anonymous wrote:The idea of moving 5th grade to middle school to create more early childhood classes does not come from someone who has middle school age children. It wasn't that long ago that DCPS moved 6th grade out to elementary schools and it was very controversial because many 6th graders are developmentally just not yet middle schoolers. Entering any 6th grade classroom, you'll see amazing disparities and wonder in amazement whey some are even in middle school. Talk to almost any 5th grade parent at Basis or Latin and they'll tell you the same story: kids having a hard time organizing and keeping on top of anything that's not from today until tomorrow. It's not because these kids are coddled or don't get it. It's because their brains aren't working that way yet. I swear I could point my finger to the day that "clicked" in my then 5th grader, it was in about February, just happened over night. At 5th grade, most are not there. At 6th grade most are. Although you'll see outliers on both ends, it makes much more sense to me to suit the majority and err on the side of elementary school for the rest. You can't make grass grow by pulling on it, as a friend once said to me. Same goes for high school, same for college. All you do is put kids in shoes that are too big for them all their lives. Why? I ask you, why? Their feet won't grow any faster.
Anonymous wrote:The idea of moving 5th grade to middle school to create more early childhood classes does not come from someone who has middle school age children. It wasn't that long ago that DCPS moved 6th grade out to elementary schools and it was very controversial because many 6th graders are developmentally just not yet middle schoolers. Entering any 6th grade classroom, you'll see amazing disparities and wonder in amazement whey some are even in middle school. Talk to almost any 5th grade parent at Basis or Latin and they'll tell you the same story: kids having a hard time organizing and keeping on top of anything that's not from today until tomorrow. It's not because these kids are coddled or don't get it. It's because their brains aren't working that way yet. I swear I could point my finger to the day that "clicked" in my then 5th grader, it was in about February, just happened over night. At 5th grade, most are not there. At 6th grade most are. Although you'll see outliers on both ends, it makes much more sense to me to suit the majority and err on the side of elementary school for the rest. You can't make grass grow by pulling on it, as a friend once said to me. Same goes for high school, same for college. All you do is put kids in shoes that are too big for them all their lives. Why? I ask you, why? Their feet won't grow any faster.
Anonymous wrote:On the contrary, DCPS would be stronger if MS started in 5th. DCPS is better at ES. Even Kaya admits this. By 5th grade, bright kids at most DCPS ESs are learning very little.
Furthermore, many DC kids are simply not ready for K when they turn five, and it is unclear that intervention at that point will catch them up. Instead, DCPS should intervene early.
DCPS should eliminate 5th grade from all of its ESs to make space for more Pre-K and PS classes.
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't the whole system be stronger if all Middle School opportunities started at 6th grade?
Students finished 5th in their elementary school (be it charter or DCPS), and then lotteried in rank order for preferred 6th grade placement, intermingling charter & DCPS
None of the DCPS schools were "education campuses" from preS to 8, instead all ended at 5th grade.
Then, there would also be students available to support an additional Ward 4 / Ward 5 DCPS middle school (the new building at Brookland, maybe a reopened Ward 4 MacFarland). And to fill the underpopulated Middle schools at McKinley Tech, Eliot-Hine, Jefferson.
What's wrong with this suggestions, what's right with it?