Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry to be so anti-ethnocentric, but the best books on the middle east tend to come out of Europe, particularly England. They have been involved in the region before the United States was born and they have a long rich tradition of understanding why they get their asses kicked every time they go there. One of the saddest places is the museum in London which shows the many incursions England made into Afghanistan and the many plaques listing the names of soldiers who perished in each of those campaigns When the US started its foolhardy incursion into Afghanistan, I sent postcards from the museum to George Bush and asked him if he really wanted to take on a country that could not be tamed by generations of Brits much less the Russians, the meanest soldiers in the universe.
Isn't Afghanistan a little far out to be considered the Middle East? I associate the ME with the Fertile Crescsent and consider Afghanistan solidly in Asia because it's closer to China and India.
I was talking about its political impact on the Middle East with its role of harboring Al Qaeda rather than its geographic location. But if you would rather put Afghanistan, India, China together that is fine. I am sure most Middle Easter countries would like to be rid of Afghanistan and let the Chinese deal with the Taliban.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry to be so anti-ethnocentric, but the best books on the middle east tend to come out of Europe, particularly England. They have been involved in the region before the United States was born and they have a long rich tradition of understanding why they get their asses kicked every time they go there. One of the saddest places is the museum in London which shows the many incursions England made into Afghanistan and the many plaques listing the names of soldiers who perished in each of those campaigns When the US started its foolhardy incursion into Afghanistan, I sent postcards from the museum to George Bush and asked him if he really wanted to take on a country that could not be tamed by generations of Brits much less the Russians, the meanest soldiers in the universe.
Isn't Afghanistan a little far out to be considered the Middle East? I associate the ME with the Fertile Crescsent and consider Afghanistan solidly in Asia because it's closer to China and India.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry to be so anti-ethnocentric, but the best books on the middle east tend to come out of Europe, particularly England. They have been involved in the region before the United States was born and they have a long rich tradition of understanding why they get their asses kicked every time they go there. One of the saddest places is the museum in London which shows the many incursions England made into Afghanistan and the many plaques listing the names of soldiers who perished in each of those campaigns When the US started its foolhardy incursion into Afghanistan, I sent postcards from the museum to George Bush and asked him if he really wanted to take on a country that could not be tamed by generations of Brits much less the Russians, the meanest soldiers in the universe.
Isn't Afghanistan a little far out to be considered the Middle East? I associate the ME with the Fertile Crescsent and consider Afghanistan solidly in Asia because it's closer to China and India.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry to be so anti-ethnocentric, but the best books on the middle east tend to come out of Europe, particularly England. They have been involved in the region before the United States was born and they have a long rich tradition of understanding why they get their asses kicked every time they go there. One of the saddest places is the museum in London which shows the many incursions England made into Afghanistan and the many plaques listing the names of soldiers who perished in each of those campaigns When the US started its foolhardy incursion into Afghanistan, I sent postcards from the museum to George Bush and asked him if he really wanted to take on a country that could not be tamed by generations of Brits much less the Russians, the meanest soldiers in the universe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read the CIA country fact book. It'll give you a basic background. But your question is a bit absurd when, do you know of one for American history? America has only been around for how long? At the very least you'll have to start with the book of Genisis and move on through the new testament, (no need to read anything envolving later day saints) through in some Egyptians (but they weren't called that) some Romans, add a few crusades, divisions in the Christian church and Islam, colonialism, two world wars and then maybe you'll have a very basic understanding. You'll also want to study Arabic because the language is very important as well. Good luck'
Spoken like a true ethnocentric ignoramus. You don't know what OP knows or doesn't know about US history. The Bible isn't the work of historians and is pretty much fiction.
The history of the Middle East stretches back to 10,000 BC long before Islam was established. Written Arabic and spoken dialects are actually two different things. Knowing Arabic isn't a prerequisite for understanding current events.
Good for the OP for broadening his/her horizons. I wish you would do the same.
Anonymous wrote:Read the CIA country fact book. It'll give you a basic background. But your question is a bit absurd when, do you know of one for American history? America has only been around for how long? At the very least you'll have to start with the book of Genisis and move on through the new testament, (no need to read anything envolving later day saints) through in some Egyptians (but they weren't called that) some Romans, add a few crusades, divisions in the Christian church and Islam, colonialism, two world wars and then maybe you'll have a very basic understanding. You'll also want to study Arabic because the language is very important as well. Good luck'