Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you for all your responses. He is in OT and speech therapy and in pep classic. If there was any way to avoid medication I would. Unfortunately it is so severe that it impacts every part of his life. I myself have ADHD and was on meds in high school and college. I know I hated the way I felt on it. I'm hoping that medication has improved. I feel that if he could just pay attention he could be so much more successful. He is not hyperactive but completely inattentive.
OP, our DS started medication right around the time he turned five. Like your DC, our DS has ADHD and significant developmental delays. Our developmental ped at KKI finally said "you know what, he's falling so far behind on some fundamental learning skills and we might have an opportunity to help boost that development by trying meds early since attention and distractibility has become a real obstacle and there's no point in waiting for him to fail when academics really kick in after about second grade." So we've been trying Focalin. Although originally I was opposed to medication, after watching my DS struggle and after recognizing the global impact of the inattention and executive-functioning deficits on DS's social, educational, physical and emotional development, I decided that if there was any chance at all that meds might help him then it was worth a try. That being said, we unfortunately have not really seen any difference in DS's behavior or development at home, although DS's teachers have said they see some improvement at school. DS is on a very low dose of Focalin so I don't know if maybe his ADHD is so severe that the dosage is not sufficient or whether Focalin is just not the right med. We've tried the Focalin for about 7 months. Honestly, I wish it was working better because at this point I would be willing to try almost anything if it would help my DS. And changes in diet, etc., have not done squat for him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't imagine any "educated" physician would put a 5 year old child on stimulant ADD meds.
Maybe put the adults in his enviornment, in some childhood development classes.
We started our son on medication at age 5. He was diagnosed through the NIH study, and medication was recommended by those doctors as well as his psychologist (from a practice well regarded on this forum). We tried diet change, OT, and behaviorial therapy before turning to meds the second half of his kindergarten year. He literally could not function in the classroom, despite numerous interventions and a fabulous teacher who worked very hard with us. The meds turned his (and our) lives around.
What do you mean by "literally could not function in the classroom"?
This question is for 23:08, the NIH parent. Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't imagine any "educated" physician would put a 5 year old child on stimulant ADD meds.
Maybe put the adults in his enviornment, in some childhood development classes.
We started our son on medication at age 5. He was diagnosed through the NIH study, and medication was recommended by those doctors as well as his psychologist (from a practice well regarded on this forum). We tried diet change, OT, and behaviorial therapy before turning to meds the second half of his kindergarten year. He literally could not function in the classroom, despite numerous interventions and a fabulous teacher who worked very hard with us. The meds turned his (and our) lives around.
What do you mean by "literally could not function in the classroom"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What do you mean by "literally could not function in the classroom"?
Not the PP you're asking the question of but if you don't know what she means, I highly suspect you're from General Parenting. One of the nice things about this forum is that 'we' already know what she means because we've experienced it or take her word for it.
Don't be snotty, PP.
PPP, I'm not the poster who used that phrase, but kids who can't stay in their seat or are to inattentive to pay attention would be examples. Every kid is different, and sometimes the school is just isn't the right fit for a kid. Or sometimes SN preschools can accommodate a kid with ADHD better and medication at a young age isn't a necessity. It's rather subjective.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't imagine any "educated" physician would put a 5 year old child on stimulant ADD meds.
Maybe put the adults in his enviornment, in some childhood development classes.
We started our son on medication at age 5. He was diagnosed through the NIH study, and medication was recommended by those doctors as well as his psychologist (from a practice well regarded on this forum). We tried diet change, OT, and behaviorial therapy before turning to meds the second half of his kindergarten year. He literally could not function in the classroom, despite numerous interventions and a fabulous teacher who worked very hard with us. The meds turned his (and our) lives around.
What do you mean by "literally could not function in the classroom"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't imagine any "educated" physician would put a 5 year old child on stimulant ADD meds.
Maybe put the adults in his enviornment, in some childhood development classes.
We started our son on medication at age 5. He was diagnosed through the NIH study, and medication was recommended by those doctors as well as his psychologist (from a practice well regarded on this forum). We tried diet change, OT, and behaviorial therapy before turning to meds the second half of his kindergarten year. He literally could not function in the classroom, despite numerous interventions and a fabulous teacher who worked very hard with us. The meds turned his (and our) lives around.
Anonymous wrote:Can't imagine any "educated" physician would put a 5 year old child on stimulant ADD meds.
Maybe put the adults in his enviornment, in some childhood development classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Executive Function involves motor/frontal cortex development. I wasn't talking about attention. Long term use of stimulants also has repercussions, like growth, behavioral, and sleep problems. I am not anti-meds, my 17 year old is still on them..I just think a 5 year old is too young for them, which is just an opinion. I would not do it to my kid
Not the PP you're responding to but you are woefully ignorant about the neurological basis of executive functioning. Neurotransmitters are involved with executive functioning. The delay in maturation of the frontal lobe results in slower development of executive functioning but the neurotransmitters also have a huge impact.
Yes, stimulants may have some impact if used long term but so does everything else we use on a long term basis (What kind of water do you drink? Do you only eat organic?) And, stimulants aren't the only medication used to treat ADHD. It tends to be the most effective but if the side effects aren't tolerable, there are alternatives.
I don't think you realize how judgmental your post is. You say you're not anti-meds but you sure sound like it. What's the difference between a 9 year old and a 5 year old if ADHD is negatively affecting his life? If I had a choice, I wouldn't 'do' ADHD to my kid. It may not have been necessary to introduce medication to your DS at an early age but to say parents who use medication with younger kids are "doing" something to them is just out of bounds and uncalled for.
Making the decision to m
edicate isn't easy nor should it be. But the decision should be made on fact, not feelings or unsupported opinion.
Anonymous wrote:Executive Function involves motor/frontal cortex development. I wasn't talking about attention. Long term use of stimulants also has repercussions, like growth, behavioral, and sleep problems. I am not anti-meds, my 17 year old is still on them..I just think a 5 year old is too young for them, which is just an opinion. I would not do it to my kid