Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Against. I decided that when women started taking unapproved meds so that they could breast feed, we had gone too far with the "benefits" of breast milk. I won't use a provider who condones this in an way.
Domperidone is not approved by the FDA in the US, but it is approved in other countries (Canada, for example). And yes, it's not approved for increasing supply, but there are lots of medications that health care providers routinely prescribe for off-label use (i.e., prescribed for a purpose other than the purpose approved by the drug-approval agency).
I am aware. I am also aware that the FDA has issued a warning against its use. I understand off-label uses and in my belief, they should only be used where the potential benefits far exceed the unknown or known risks. To put bf in this category is ridiculous and dangerous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Against. I decided that when women started taking unapproved meds so that they could breast feed, we had gone too far with the "benefits" of breast milk. I won't use a provider who condones this in an way.
Domperidone is not approved by the FDA in the US, but it is approved in other countries (Canada, for example). And yes, it's not approved for increasing supply, but there are lots of medications that health care providers routinely prescribe for off-label use (i.e., prescribed for a purpose other than the purpose approved by the drug-approval agency).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Against. I decided that when women started taking unapproved meds so that they could breast feed, we had gone too far with the "benefits" of breast milk. I won't use a provider who condones this in an way.
Domperidone is not approved by the FDA in the US, but it is approved in other countries (Canada, for example). And yes, it's not approved for increasing supply, but there are lots of medications that health care providers routinely prescribe for off-label use (i.e., prescribed for a purpose other than the purpose approved by the drug-approval agency).
Anonymous wrote:Against. I decided that when women started taking unapproved meds so that they could breast feed, we had gone too far with the "benefits" of breast milk. I won't use a provider who condones this in an way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I took it and it doubled my supply. It is available OTC in other countries. I had no side effects accept for maybe a bit of loose stools. The benefits far outweighed the side effects.
The only pain was that it took forever to get it from the Canadian pharmacy I ordered it from. For baby #2 I'll be ordering ahead of time. It was much cheaper than getting it at the compounding pharmacy.
I read a ton before I decided to go this route, also at the suggestion of a LC. Never did I come across anything saying it causes organ damage! Does the PP have any references?
caused heart failure in a study according to my lc. results are often overlooked because study samples were elderly men not bfing moms. but still not worth the risk in my opinion.
Unless you can show some reference, I'm not sure this study exists. I've done a bunch of research in this area,and never come across this study.
Anonymous wrote:Against. I decided that when women started taking unapproved meds so that they could breast feed, we had gone too far with the "benefits" of breast milk. I won't use a provider who condones this in an way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I took it and it doubled my supply. It is available OTC in other countries. I had no side effects accept for maybe a bit of loose stools. The benefits far outweighed the side effects.
The only pain was that it took forever to get it from the Canadian pharmacy I ordered it from. For baby #2 I'll be ordering ahead of time. It was much cheaper than getting it at the compounding pharmacy.
I read a ton before I decided to go this route, also at the suggestion of a LC. Never did I come across anything saying it causes organ damage! Does the PP have any references?
caused heart failure in a study according to my lc. results are often overlooked because study samples were elderly men not bfing moms. but still not worth the risk in my opinion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I took it and it doubled my supply. It is available OTC in other countries. I had no side effects accept for maybe a bit of loose stools. The benefits far outweighed the side effects.
The only pain was that it took forever to get it from the Canadian pharmacy I ordered it from. For baby #2 I'll be ordering ahead of time. It was much cheaper than getting it at the compounding pharmacy.
I read a ton before I decided to go this route, also at the suggestion of a LC. Never did I come across anything saying it causes organ damage! Does the PP have any references?
caused heart failure in a study according to my lc. results are often overlooked because study samples were elderly men not bfing moms. but still not worth the risk in my opinion.
Anonymous wrote:I took it and it doubled my supply. It is available OTC in other countries. I had no side effects accept for maybe a bit of loose stools. The benefits far outweighed the side effects.
The only pain was that it took forever to get it from the Canadian pharmacy I ordered it from. For baby #2 I'll be ordering ahead of time. It was much cheaper than getting it at the compounding pharmacy.
I read a ton before I decided to go this route, also at the suggestion of a LC. Never did I come across anything saying it causes organ damage! Does the PP have any references?