Anonymous wrote:
I don't disagree or doubt your statement. I simply think that in order to do this type of boundary shift it will be rolled into a larger, more wide-spread "social justice" based boundary shift. This way, theoretically, parents won't be able to effectively fight their individual changes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What boundaries in Bethesda do you think are going to change that will markedly change the wealth of the area..It is not like the boundaries can move a few miles and Whitman will include a low income housing project.
The people most likely affected will be those on the edges who barely made it into the cluster.
Oh c'mon, that's not the way it would happen. Too much push back. No, MCPS would shroud this type of boundary shift in the new lingo of social justice in order to get buy-in for it. That would mean moving boundary lines in ways that are not just about shaving off a few blocks around the edges. Save your schadenfreude until you can be sure you wouldn't be affected. And, as always, be careful what you ask for (or, in this case, feel smug about).
I live on the edge of a cluster which is why I'm mentioning it and it's nowhere near the awesome W schools. In our case, we live in germantown. The study says both of the high schools Seneca valley and Northwest will be overcrowded. There are no plans to do anything with our school Northwest but Seneca Valley will be both revitalized and expanded. It states overcrowded at NW will be relieved by the changes to Seneca which as I see it has to mean boundary changes. NW is considered the better of the two schools.
Anonymous wrote:
I live on the edge of a cluster which is why I'm mentioning it and it's nowhere near the awesome W schools. In our case, we live in germantown. The study says both of the high schools Seneca valley and Northwest will be overcrowded. There are no plans to do anything with our school Northwest but Seneca Valley will be both revitalized and expanded. It states overcrowded at NW will be relieved by the changes to Seneca which as I see it has to mean boundary changes. NW is considered the better of the two schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What boundaries in Bethesda do you think are going to change that will markedly change the wealth of the area..It is not like the boundaries can move a few miles and Whitman will include a low income housing project.
The people most likely affected will be those on the edges who barely made it into the cluster.
Oh c'mon, that's not the way it would happen. Too much push back. No, MCPS would shroud this type of boundary shift in the new lingo of social justice in order to get buy-in for it. That would mean moving boundary lines in ways that are not just about shaving off a few blocks around the edges. Save your schadenfreude until you can be sure you wouldn't be affected. And, as always, be careful what you ask for (or, in this case, feel smug about).
Anonymous wrote:
Oh c'mon, that's not the way it would happen. Too much push back. No, MCPS would shroud this type of boundary shift in the new lingo of social justice in order to get buy-in for it. That would mean moving boundary lines in ways that are not just about shaving off a few blocks around the edges. Save your schadenfreude until you can be sure you wouldn't be affected. And, as always, be careful what you ask for (or, in this case, feel smug about).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What boundaries in Bethesda do you think are going to change that will markedly change the wealth of the area..It is not like the boundaries can move a few miles and Whitman will include a low income housing project.
The people most likely affected will be those on the edges who barely made it into the cluster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What boundaries in Bethesda do you think are going to change that will markedly change the wealth of the area..It is not like the boundaries can move a few miles and Whitman will include a low income housing project.
The people most likely affected will be those on the edges who barely made it into the cluster.
Anonymous wrote:What boundaries in Bethesda do you think are going to change that will markedly change the wealth of the area..It is not like the boundaries can move a few miles and Whitman will include a low income housing project.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will sit back and laugh at all those people who spent a freaking fortune to live in a particular school cluster. The boundaries are bound to change eventually.
I agree.
They are always being adjusted. fact of life
For now, the schools that remain untouched are those "far out there." I doubt Damascus HS will suffer through boundary changes - or Poolesville. Sherwood HS refused to join the NEC, which was a wise decision, as the NEC only pits neighbor against neighbor and creates an unfair competition among three schools. As it stands now, there's a bit of a split articulation with Farquhar, which doesn't make people happy.
The likelihood of rezoning increases when more and more areas become densely populated and the SES levels show a dramatic gap.
I agree; Bethesda in particular will become affected. And those who laughed at us for moving "far out" will not be laughing for long.[/quote]
How so? Please explain?
Any night that I can return home inside the beltway and don't have to sit in bumper to bumper traffic up 270, or drive far out River, or inch up 28...185N or 97N or 29N...is a good night.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The population will keep growing, right? Will school districts eventually start building vertically? What's the alternative?
The alternative is building school additions and new schools. Which MCPS is planning to do.
Anonymous wrote:The population will keep growing, right? Will school districts eventually start building vertically? What's the alternative?