Anonymous wrote:Yes, I can totally see that we will pay $55,000 a year for at least two of our children to go to small liberal arts schools. One of our kids thrives in smaller classes and the other is dyslexic. In both cases, I'd rather pay for a small liberal arts school with a tight community (with a high 4 year graduation rate) than take the chance that they would fail at a larger school.
Both DH and I had siblings who were weaker students that flailed at large state schools. I'd rather see my kids finish on time and have a better college experience. This assumes that the small liberal arts experience is what they want though.
The extra money over a state school is not a burden for us, the calculation would change if the kids or us needed to take out excessive student loans.
Anonymous wrote:So what excuse do you use for a minority with a 4.0 and 2300 on the SAT? You better believe they are substantial. HYP is not admitting ANYONE with substandard grades and can't handle the work.Anonymous wrote:Discrimination based on race is wrong. Should that even be debatable?
But I understand why the beneficiaries of affirmative action continue to dream up bizarre justifications for discrimination.
So what excuse do you use for a minority with a 4.0 and 2300 on the SAT? You better believe they are substantial. HYP is not admitting ANYONE with substandard grades and can't handle the work.Anonymous wrote:Discrimination based on race is wrong. Should that even be debatable?
But I understand why the beneficiaries of affirmative action continue to dream up bizarre justifications for discrimination.
Anonymous wrote:liberal arts history degree at an ivy dumb, STEM degree at a local university smart
Anonymous wrote:liberal arts history degree at an ivy dumb, STEM degree at a local university smart
Anonymous wrote:Yes, I can totally see that we will pay $55,000 a year for at least two of our children to go to small liberal arts schools. One of our kids thrives in smaller classes and the other is dyslexic. In both cases, I'd rather pay for a small liberal arts school with a tight community (with a high 4 year graduation rate) than take the chance that they would fail at a larger school.
Both DH and I had siblings who were weaker students that flailed at large state schools. I'd rather see my kids finish on time and have a better college experience. This assumes that the small liberal arts experience is what they want though.
The extra money over a state school is not a burden for us, the calculation would change if the kids or us needed to take out excessive student loans.
Anonymous wrote:Going through the whole application process right now with my senior and feeling like there is really no college worth this kind of tuition. Am I wrong? Is there a place out there that would make it worth paying approx. $240K for four years?
Anonymous wrote:
12:37 I honestly cannot take your graph as real. Berkely was banned many years ago from considering racial status in admittance. If you have Berkely wrong, what else do you have wrong.
Not this PP, but there are definitely preferences given to underrepresented minorities. See this all the time. We just went through the college app/admin process last year and I was amazed at the kids with non-white backgrounds getting into Penn, W&M, UVa, that had they been white, no chance.
Anonymous wrote:12:37 I honestly cannot take your graph as real. Berkely was banned many years ago from considering racial status in admittance. If you have Berkely wrong, what else do you have wrong.