Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't you each need a lawyer? Seems hard for one lawyer to represent both of you, since the premise of the agreement is you will be separating.
OP here, yes I believe that's correct although most of the fees will be incurred by the lawyer drafting the agreement. I assume the fees for the lawyer advising the other party won't be that much as we're in agreement on the substance of the terms.
Domestic relations lawyer here: this is not true at all. It is labor intensive going through and figuring out what was left out...
Fair enough. Can you provide any ballpark cost estimates for a fairly simple prenupt/marital agreement? Separate finances so we'd keep our own accounts, 401Ks, neither side pays alimony, etc. so it should be fairly straightforward.
Also, any thoughts on how we can reduce legal fees? Our thought was to prepare an itemized list of things and our agreement on them as well as a list of assets for disclosure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Neither of us had two pennies to rub together when we got married straight out of grad school, so no.
However, if one of us had significant pre-existing assets, we would have one, and I would have no problems signing it.
Your first sentence applies to me and my late husband - we married in our late 20s with no assets whatsoever.
Now I have more than $2M in assets and a child whose interests I need to protect. If I were to marry again I'd require one, and I'd have no problem signing one for someone with equal or greater assets than I have.
Another widow in similar situation--my children come first and I'd only get married with a prenup.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't you each need a lawyer? Seems hard for one lawyer to represent both of you, since the premise of the agreement is you will be separating.
OP here, yes I believe that's correct although most of the fees will be incurred by the lawyer drafting the agreement. I assume the fees for the lawyer advising the other party won't be that much as we're in agreement on the substance of the terms.
Domestic relations lawyer here: this is not true at all. It is labor intensive going through and figuring out what was left out...
Fair enough. Can you provide any ballpark cost estimates for a fairly simple prenupt/marital agreement? Separate finances so we'd keep our own accounts, 401Ks, neither side pays alimony, etc. so it should be fairly straightforward.
Also, any thoughts on how we can reduce legal fees? Our thought was to prepare an itemized list of things and our agreement on them as well as a list of assets for disclosure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't you each need a lawyer? Seems hard for one lawyer to represent both of you, since the premise of the agreement is you will be separating.
OP here, yes I believe that's correct although most of the fees will be incurred by the lawyer drafting the agreement. I assume the fees for the lawyer advising the other party won't be that much as we're in agreement on the substance of the terms.
Domestic relations lawyer here: this is not true at all. It is labor intensive going through and figuring out what was left out...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now that we're married it's called a marital agreement but it's basically the same as a prenupt. We've discussed getting one and we're generally in agreement on what is fair and I'm wondering if we should formalize our agreement. I've heard several variations of the "don't plan for the marriage to fail" and "you should know the person you marry well enough" etc. so I'll pre-emptively provide my response to that. Statistically the frequency of divorce is high so I think it would be foolish for us to assume it couldn't happen. After all, ask anyone who is divorced if they thought it would happen at the time they got married and hopefully they'd say no. In addition, reading several of the threads on divorce and people on both sides can become monsters during a divorce so just because someone is reasonable now doesn't mean they would be if things don't work out. We're both in it for the long run but recognize that unfortunately sometimes things don't work out even for the best of us. Maybe in some ways its like car insurance where you hope you never have to use it.
The pros would be eliminating uncertainty in the event of divorce as you never know what a judge will decide which is huge for us. I think/hope it would also reduce attorney expenses/litigation costs because you have a formal agreement. The only negative I can see is the cost although I'm not really sure what it would be for a basic prenupt. It might increase the likelihood of divorce by making it logistically easier for either of us to walk away but I'm not sure if this is a pro or a con as this the logistical difficulty of a divorce isn't a great reason for two people to stay together.
What state?
Good point, state is VA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Neither of us had two pennies to rub together when we got married straight out of grad school, so no.
However, if one of us had significant pre-existing assets, we would have one, and I would have no problems signing it.
Your first sentence applies to me and my late husband - we married in our late 20s with no assets whatsoever.
Now I have more than $2M in assets and a child whose interests I need to protect. If I were to marry again I'd require one, and I'd have no problem signing one for someone with equal or greater assets than I have.
Anonymous wrote:Now that we're married it's called a marital agreement but it's basically the same as a prenupt. We've discussed getting one and we're generally in agreement on what is fair and I'm wondering if we should formalize our agreement. I've heard several variations of the "don't plan for the marriage to fail" and "you should know the person you marry well enough" etc. so I'll pre-emptively provide my response to that. Statistically the frequency of divorce is high so I think it would be foolish for us to assume it couldn't happen. After all, ask anyone who is divorced if they thought it would happen at the time they got married and hopefully they'd say no. In addition, reading several of the threads on divorce and people on both sides can become monsters during a divorce so just because someone is reasonable now doesn't mean they would be if things don't work out. We're both in it for the long run but recognize that unfortunately sometimes things don't work out even for the best of us. Maybe in some ways its like car insurance where you hope you never have to use it.
The pros would be eliminating uncertainty in the event of divorce as you never know what a judge will decide which is huge for us. I think/hope it would also reduce attorney expenses/litigation costs because you have a formal agreement. The only negative I can see is the cost although I'm not really sure what it would be for a basic prenupt. It might increase the likelihood of divorce by making it logistically easier for either of us to walk away but I'm not sure if this is a pro or a con as this the logistical difficulty of a divorce isn't a great reason for two people to stay together.
What state?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't you each need a lawyer? Seems hard for one lawyer to represent both of you, since the premise of the agreement is you will be separating.
OP here, yes I believe that's correct although most of the fees will be incurred by the lawyer drafting the agreement. I assume the fees for the lawyer advising the other party won't be that much as we're in agreement on the substance of the terms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Neither of us had two pennies to rub together when we got married straight out of grad school, so no.
However, if one of us had significant pre-existing assets, we would have one, and I would have no problems signing it.
+2
Anonymous wrote:Neither of us had two pennies to rub together when we got married straight out of grad school, so no.
However, if one of us had significant pre-existing assets, we would have one, and I would have no problems signing it.
Anonymous wrote:Neither of us had two pennies to rub together when we got married straight out of grad school, so no.
However, if one of us had significant pre-existing assets, we would have one, and I would have no problems signing it.
Anonymous wrote:Neither of us had two pennies to rub together when we got married straight out of grad school, so no.
However, if one of us had significant pre-existing assets, we would have one, and I would have no problems signing it.