Anonymous wrote:On top of everything else that has already been listed -- please investigate very carefully the cost of insurance before you buy a waterfront home. The cost of flood insurance is going to double in many areas over the next few years. There are protections for residents, but the cost for second homes will go up more quickly, particularly for older homes that are not up to modern "code." I saw an article where a woman had calculated that in seven years, the flood insurance was going to have cost more than the value of her house. The problem is that, if you have a mortgage, the bank will require that you have it. Also, be aware that you will need separate wind insurance, in addition to regular homeowners insurance. Also, property taxes for waterfront areas tend to be steep. We had a waterfront home, and even with the old cheaper flood insurance, insurance and taxes were half of our mortgage payment (for a million dollar home). On the other hand, if you wait a couple of years, and can pay cash, you can probably get a steal on a waterfront home.
As others have mentioned, unless you are there at least twice a month, you will have to have a caretaker/yard service. If you don't have a caretaker, you will spend all of your time at the house doing the work yourself. Even if it's just meeting repairmen, etc. -- think about how much of that you do in your residence, and imagine cramming it all into a weekend.
We loved our house, and when dc was young, we spent a LOT of time there. However, once DC started school, we just couldn't use it enough to make it worthwhile. After I realized that, for the price we were paying, and the number of days we were there, we could have stayed at Georges V in Paris and had money left over, we decided it was time to get out. VRBO is now my best friend. The real epiphany was when we rented a house and I realized that I could just drop the key in the slot and walk away. Someone else was going to worry about where that hurricane is headed, and getting the dishwasher fixed and whether the roof is leaking. We haven't looked back. I may buy another second home someday, but only when I'm able to spend an extended amount of time there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a house on the Cape (Cod). We have a caretaker for the off season who checks on the house once a week. We leave the heat on low in the winter so have highish utility bills for a couple of months. We have a landscaper. We have a housecleaner in the summer (in addition to the housecleaner in DC, who we pay year round). There are periodic repairs (hot water heater, kitchen appliances, etc.), although we haven't had anything big happen in 10 years.
We basically live there in the summer so yes we are doing laundry or whatever but we would have to do laundry if we were home, or if we returned from a week long vacation somewhere. Unlike the PP, that doesn't bother me. I actually consider it more of a second home than a vacation home- we do go on vacations to other places.
Hey everyone: she does her own laundry so, there's that.
Huh?? I was only commenting on another post that you have to do "projects" and chores like laundry at both houses. I have not found that to be an issue because we would do laundry or grocery shopping or whatever no matter where we are.
Not the PP who posted the "hey everyone", but I think that poster was making a joke of the fact that you have a full time cleaner in both homes, a landscaper (not to mention caretaker) so, of course, you don't mind doing your own laundry. Unlike us peons who have none of that and therefore "mind" doing laundry amongst all the other drudgery tasks you pay other people to do.
Sorry - I guess I should have been clearer. I have someone who comes in every two weeks to clean. That is not full time. But it is, at least for us, a cost of having a second house, which is I believe what the OP was asking. And yes we have a landscaper because the house is 9 hours away and the lawn needs to be mowed even when we aren't there. So it's not a luxury, it's pretty much a requirement for a second home, unless it is one that you plan to be in every single weekend and want to spend the time while you are there mowing the lawn. I don't choose to do that in either house. Same with the caretaker - where we are pretty much everyone has one because you need someone to be checking to make sure there aren't any water issues, break ins, whatever. It costs us $60/month so I don't consider it an outlandish cost.
Bottom line - a second home, at least one that is not a short drive away, does require more outsourcing because you just aren't there to do all the work. That is a cost of having a second home, which was, again, the OPs question.
You may have chosen to manage your second house differently - good for you.
Anonymous wrote:insurance.
caretaker (rather nice to have someone to check on the place periodically, especially after major weather events, and to notice if there are squatters or vandals).
General maintenance budget (painting, new roof every XX years, new HVAC every YY years, etc).
Yard service for both homes.
And by the time your kids are 8, you will have birthday parties, sleepovers, and games to attend on weekends. I don't think a child's schedule should truly rule the household, but it needs to be taken into account.
The reality is that you can do a LOT of nice vacations for the annual costs of a vacation home. And I have yet to see anything that convinces me that vacation homes are a good long-term "investment". And ocean-front property is a pretty big long-term risk with rising sea levels.
Anonymous wrote:insurance.
caretaker (rather nice to have someone to check on the place periodically, especially after major weather events, and to notice if there are squatters or vandals).
General maintenance budget (painting, new roof every XX years, new HVAC every YY years, etc).
Yard service for both homes.
And by the time your kids are 8, you will have birthday parties, sleepovers, and games to attend on weekends. I don't think a child's schedule should truly rule the household, but it needs to be taken into account.
The reality is that you can do a LOT of nice vacations for the annual costs of a vacation home. And I have yet to see anything that convinces me that vacation homes are a good long-term "investment". And ocean-front property is a pretty big long-term risk with rising sea levels.