Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People have tons of different answers to that question. One I have heard multiple times is real estate should be 20% excluding your primary residence. Another common one is 33%, presumably including your primary residence.
This is almost exactly where we are - real estate is 22% of our portfolio without our primary residence, and 33% with it. The rest is in stocks and bonds with a small amount (less than 5%) in cash. Our net worth is about $1.5M total
Your primary residence is CHEAP. wow.
No, whatever you calculated in your head is their equity in their primary residence, not the value of the actual house. For all we know, their residence could be $800,000 with $150,000 down and just starting to pay the mortgage.
Very close. Primary residence was $725K with a $460K mortgage. I estimate equity at about $220K because I subtract estimated costs associated with selling.
Small downpayment for such a rich guy.
Pay down that massive mortgage.
Rich girl![]()
And no thanks. Investments have gained 20% in the two years since I took out my 3.5% mortgage.
What number wife are you?
How many other kids does he have?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People have tons of different answers to that question. One I have heard multiple times is real estate should be 20% excluding your primary residence. Another common one is 33%, presumably including your primary residence.
This is almost exactly where we are - real estate is 22% of our portfolio without our primary residence, and 33% with it. The rest is in stocks and bonds with a small amount (less than 5%) in cash. Our net worth is about $1.5M total
Your primary residence is CHEAP. wow.
No, whatever you calculated in your head is their equity in their primary residence, not the value of the actual house. For all we know, their residence could be $800,000 with $150,000 down and just starting to pay the mortgage.
Very close. Primary residence was $725K with a $460K mortgage. I estimate equity at about $220K because I subtract estimated costs associated with selling.
Small downpayment for such a rich guy.
Pay down that massive mortgage.
Rich girl![]()
And no thanks. Investments have gained 20% in the two years since I took out my 3.5% mortgage.
Anonymous wrote:
Cheese Lady, you rock. This is OP. I don't have a catchy name - maybe "slumlord wannabe?"![]()
Your advice is wonderful. I am going to sit down after kids are in bed and really research your advice about funds. I admit that since I love RE so much I've really neglected learning about other parts of the market. I'll put and end to that soon (I just find it so intimidating!) But you're definitely helping.
As far as vacancies, I am not exaggerating when I say that it rarely ever happens. Three properties are within 2 blocks of the Shaw metro and the other 2 are in Columbia Heights in good locations. Generally I have new tenants lined up before the old ones depart, and have it vacant for merely days while I re-paint and make repairs in-between. In 11 years, I can think of one time that one apartment went vacant for 1.5 months. Really, it's been wonderful.
The property manager is full-service; he handles repairs, inspects every few months, and even facilitated replacing that old kitchen. I don't do the slumlord thing but I don't install granite either - "builder grade" and "decent quality" are my buzzwords when making repairs and improvements. I do insist on making repairs immediately and replacing worn-out fixtures and appliances. A little money spent goes a long way towards getting, and keeping, excellent tenants. I recently lost a tenant that had been in one of my group homes for 7 years!
Since you've been so generous, can you tell me what you would do with the added info that I am 39, DH is 52, our kids are 6 and 8 and although we've been trying for another kiddo it looks like we may be done. Anything you would do differently with that info?
Again, thank you. I really appreciate the guidance. Some people would be too nervous to be landlords but I find it easy - the investing stuff is what I find totally intimidating! That and health insurance stuff.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People have tons of different answers to that question. One I have heard multiple times is real estate should be 20% excluding your primary residence. Another common one is 33%, presumably including your primary residence.
This is almost exactly where we are - real estate is 22% of our portfolio without our primary residence, and 33% with it. The rest is in stocks and bonds with a small amount (less than 5%) in cash. Our net worth is about $1.5M total
Your primary residence is CHEAP. wow.
No, whatever you calculated in your head is their equity in their primary residence, not the value of the actual house. For all we know, their residence could be $800,000 with $150,000 down and just starting to pay the mortgage.
Very close. Primary residence was $725K with a $460K mortgage. I estimate equity at about $220K because I subtract estimated costs associated with selling.
Small downpayment for such a rich guy.
Pay down that massive mortgage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is Cheese Lady. OK, so you make roughly 5% return, after all expenses. Are you sure you are taking into account months when some units are vacant? that would bring down your return even more. This is a respectable return. What are the prognoses for long-term appreciation? Some places have good growth potential, some are just saturated, already had their golden years, and won't skyrocket further.
And this property manager, what does he do? Just collect rent checks? I mean, you still have to deal with leaky pipes and cutting checks to repairmen, no?
I love real estate. So, I get you when you basically say you feel its your calling. You enjoy it more than watching passive investments in the stock market, eh? You would probably make more money if you had a *touch* more of the slumlord in you--you probably put in very nice fixtures rather than the cheapie "rental" versions.
BUT, you are definitely overinvested. RE is a great hedge in some ways, and depending on location, can really cushion any market freefalls. But RE can also start to tank too, and with few exceptions, won't have great growth in the long run compared to stocks. Since you guys seem relatively young, I would recommend investing in equities and broadening out. If you are not that psyched, you can take the conventional wisdom and invest in an array of broad index stocks (domestic, international, growth, big companies, medium companies, small companies) and just ignore them. Avoid trying to play the market and invest in individual stocks. Great way to lose a bundle. Try to steel your nerves and invest regularly, not just at market peaks--that can really eat into your growth. Invest regular amounts in regular intervals, doing so even when the market is tanking and people are divesting like rats off a sinking ship.
At the end of your working life, hopefully you will have a very sizable goose that will continue to spit out eggs that you can live on comfortably til your dying days and secure the futures of your children and children's children for years to come.
Best of luck to you and your prosperous future!
Cheese Lady, you rock. This is OP. I don't have a catchy name - maybe "slumlord wannabe?"![]()
Your advice is wonderful. I am going to sit down after kids are in bed and really research your advice about funds. I admit that since I love RE so much I've really neglected learning about other parts of the market. I'll put and end to that soon (I just find it so intimidating!) But you're definitely helping.
As far as vacancies, I am not exaggerating when I say that it rarely ever happens. Three properties are within 2 blocks of the Shaw metro and the other 2 are in Columbia Heights in good locations. Generally I have new tenants lined up before the old ones depart, and have it vacant for merely days while I re-paint and make repairs in-between. In 11 years, I can think of one time that one apartment went vacant for 1.5 months. Really, it's been wonderful.
The property manager is full-service; he handles repairs, inspects every few months, and even facilitated replacing that old kitchen. I don't do the slumlord thing but I don't install granite either - "builder grade" and "decent quality" are my buzzwords when making repairs and improvements. I do insist on making repairs immediately and replacing worn-out fixtures and appliances. A little money spent goes a long way towards getting, and keeping, excellent tenants. I recently lost a tenant that had been in one of my group homes for 7 years!
Since you've been so generous, can you tell me what you would do with the added info that I am 39, DH is 52, our kids are 6 and 8 and although we've been trying for another kiddo it looks like we may be done. Anything you would do differently with that info?
Again, thank you. I really appreciate the guidance. Some people would be too nervous to be landlords but I find it easy - the investing stuff is what I find totally intimidating! That and health insurance stuff.![]()
Anonymous wrote:
This is Cheese Lady. OK, so you make roughly 5% return, after all expenses. Are you sure you are taking into account months when some units are vacant? that would bring down your return even more. This is a respectable return. What are the prognoses for long-term appreciation? Some places have good growth potential, some are just saturated, already had their golden years, and won't skyrocket further.
And this property manager, what does he do? Just collect rent checks? I mean, you still have to deal with leaky pipes and cutting checks to repairmen, no?
I love real estate. So, I get you when you basically say you feel its your calling. You enjoy it more than watching passive investments in the stock market, eh? You would probably make more money if you had a *touch* more of the slumlord in you--you probably put in very nice fixtures rather than the cheapie "rental" versions.
BUT, you are definitely overinvested. RE is a great hedge in some ways, and depending on location, can really cushion any market freefalls. But RE can also start to tank too, and with few exceptions, won't have great growth in the long run compared to stocks. Since you guys seem relatively young, I would recommend investing in equities and broadening out. If you are not that psyched, you can take the conventional wisdom and invest in an array of broad index stocks (domestic, international, growth, big companies, medium companies, small companies) and just ignore them. Avoid trying to play the market and invest in individual stocks. Great way to lose a bundle. Try to steel your nerves and invest regularly, not just at market peaks--that can really eat into your growth. Invest regular amounts in regular intervals, doing so even when the market is tanking and people are divesting like rats off a sinking ship.
At the end of your working life, hopefully you will have a very sizable goose that will continue to spit out eggs that you can live on comfortably til your dying days and secure the futures of your children and children's children for years to come.
Best of luck to you and your prosperous future!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People have tons of different answers to that question. One I have heard multiple times is real estate should be 20% excluding your primary residence. Another common one is 33%, presumably including your primary residence.
This is almost exactly where we are - real estate is 22% of our portfolio without our primary residence, and 33% with it. The rest is in stocks and bonds with a small amount (less than 5%) in cash. Our net worth is about $1.5M total
Your primary residence is CHEAP. wow.
No, whatever you calculated in your head is their equity in their primary residence, not the value of the actual house. For all we know, their residence could be $800,000 with $150,000 down and just starting to pay the mortgage.
Very close. Primary residence was $725K with a $460K mortgage. I estimate equity at about $220K because I subtract estimated costs associated with selling.
And this property manager, what does he do? Just collect rent checks? I mean, you still have to deal with leaky pipes and cutting checks to repairmen, no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What is the total value of the properties? What is your rate of return? If it is over 10% after expenses, you are doing phenomenal. Compare to the rest of your portfolio--stocks, bonds, etc. Unless your real estate returns are doing great, and this is your specialty as an investor, I would advise you to diversify.
Also, what kind of mortgages do you have? Any ARM's? If so, given the uncertainly in the coming years, I would advise you to pay them off before the rates potentially skyrocket. If you have a 30-year fixed at 3.5%, making excellent returns, and real estate is not disproportionate in your portfolio, then by all means, go buy some more.
But isn't long distance management a major pain? Who wants to hire and pay a plumber when you are miles away?
OP here, thank you - these are great questions.
Total estimated value of the properties (equity): 1.25 million (2.85 million before mortgages are taken into account). The mortgages are all fixed - one is 30/year at 4.5 and the rest were just refinanced to 15/year at 4 (good rate for investment properties I think).
Rate of return: I'm honestly not sure how to calculate this. We make 20K in rents/month, pay $13,500 in mortgages, and pay the property manager $1,600. Repairs and improvements probably take 2-3K/month on average (just installed a new kitchen in an older property, replaced a roof, etc. We try to make sure the properties are in great shape so we can expect great tenants.)
This is absolutely our specialty. We do it ethically and well. We really feel strongly about running a solid business.
That said? We really have very few other investments - we have about $175,000 in retirement accounts and $40,000 in 529s for our boys who are both younger than 10. My husband is now a State Dept employee and we're maxing out the retirement account there but that's really it.
Long distance management isn't ideal. We lived within 15 blocks of all the properties for 10 years, then we joined the Foreign Service! So off we went. The property manager is good, not great, but things are going pretty well. He's finding new tenants quickly, managing the bills well, and agrees with my philosophy of keeping the places in very good shape so that we can attract, and keep, very good tenants. I'm home on R&R at least once a year and do a sneak inspection to make sure he's keeping things in good shape.
I really appreciate your advice! Based on what I wrote, would you pay down or continue to add? Thanks again!
Anonymous wrote:OP, I agree with the PP. You do not have enough saved/invested outside of realestate. I assume your plan is to sell a property if you need money, but if something should happen with the housing market, you would be out of luck.
So you had these properties pre-foreign service. What did you/your DH do before to have so much money? Perhaps you are older and bought pre-boom.
Anonymous wrote:
What is the total value of the properties? What is your rate of return? If it is over 10% after expenses, you are doing phenomenal. Compare to the rest of your portfolio--stocks, bonds, etc. Unless your real estate returns are doing great, and this is your specialty as an investor, I would advise you to diversify.
Also, what kind of mortgages do you have? Any ARM's? If so, given the uncertainly in the coming years, I would advise you to pay them off before the rates potentially skyrocket. If you have a 30-year fixed at 3.5%, making excellent returns, and real estate is not disproportionate in your portfolio, then by all means, go buy some more.
But isn't long distance management a major pain? Who wants to hire and pay a plumber when you are miles away?