Anonymous wrote:I thought it was interesting to read in there that the highest amounts will go to dc students who enrolled in public schools ( DCPS or Charter ) starting in 6th grade. Explicityly meant to be a way to hold on to families who normally leave the public schools after elementary school. Also, there is a requirement that the student maintain primary residence in DC throughout their college years
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is unnecessary.
There is already a $10K per year program.
In addition - the poorest (qualified) students are getting scholarships and aid through other federal programs.
There does not need to be additional programs.
The $10,000 per year still does not come close to what in-state tuition is at state universities and is therefore inadequate to say the least.
It is not supposed to cover in-state tuition. It is supposed to bring down the cost to in-state tuition (from the out of state tuition). Perhaps the average gap between in state and out of state is larger than $10k, then raise it to $15k, but its NOT supposed to cover all the tuition.
Anonymous wrote:if the kids fail out they should have to pay it back
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not unprecedented:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/16/magazine/kalamazoo-mich-the-city-that-pays-for-college.html?_r=0
Though the main difference with the program in Kalamazoo is that the students must attend a Michigan public university or community college (and it was a private donation, not city funded). I have relatives in Kalamazoo using this program and it is already making a big difference.
In practice, it could revitalize DCPS and charters beyond elementary school. Families would stick around and work to make it happen if the grant is that significant. It could revitalize the economy if people stay in the city for the long haul. I really hope they pass this. It would be a game changer.
Is this why Detroit is broke.
No, sorry, Detroit went broke over graft and short-sighted policies. In comparison, this is smart policy-making, probably one that pays for itself in increased tax revenue within a decade or so.
Anonymous wrote:Why not just simplify it by enabling DC residents to claim in-state tuition at any public university? That would be a lot easier to administer and would ideally not be overly burdensome on any particular state. If, in reality, it ended up that DC residents wound up going disproportionately to public schools in VA and MD, then just think of it as a trade-off for DC not being able to impose a commuter tax.
DC has a population of what, 500,000? How many graduating college-bound seniors are we actually talking about?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not unprecedented:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/16/magazine/kalamazoo-mich-the-city-that-pays-for-college.html?_r=0
Though the main difference with the program in Kalamazoo is that the students must attend a Michigan public university or community college (and it was a private donation, not city funded). I have relatives in Kalamazoo using this program and it is already making a big difference.
In practice, it could revitalize DCPS and charters beyond elementary school. Families would stick around and work to make it happen if the grant is that significant. It could revitalize the economy if people stay in the city for the long haul. I really hope they pass this. It would be a game changer.
Is this why Detroit is broke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is unnecessary.
There is already a $10K per year program.
In addition - the poorest (qualified) students are getting scholarships and aid through other federal programs.
There does not need to be additional programs.
The $10,000 per year still does not come close to what in-state tuition is at state universities and is therefore inadequate to say the least.
Anonymous wrote:This is not unprecedented:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/16/magazine/kalamazoo-mich-the-city-that-pays-for-college.html?_r=0
Though the main difference with the program in Kalamazoo is that the students must attend a Michigan public university or community college (and it was a private donation, not city funded). I have relatives in Kalamazoo using this program and it is already making a big difference.
In practice, it could revitalize DCPS and charters beyond elementary school. Families would stick around and work to make it happen if the grant is that significant. It could revitalize the economy if people stay in the city for the long haul. I really hope they pass this. It would be a game changer.
Anonymous wrote:I thought it was interesting to read in there that the highest amounts will go to dc students who enrolled in public schools ( DCPS or Charter ) starting in 6th grade. Explicityly meant to be a way to hold on to families who normally leave the public schools after elementary school. Also, there is a requirement that the student maintain primary residence in DC throughout their college years