Anonymous wrote:When I was younger, it would have been the latter, but now that I have lived and learned and am older + wiser, it would have to be the former now.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The classically handsome guy.
Certain things can be taught.
Ugly is ugly.
You can't polish a turd.
Anonymous wrote:Who may not be considered "classically handsome" but he dresses very well or a schlub who is really handsome.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Neither: confidence.
so then how do women define confidence in a man? I'm curious as some women have said I'm confident because of X; other women say I'm arrogant because of the same X.
A confident person never needs to put anyone else down or belabor a point in a discussion.
An arrogant person criticizes or argues because s/he knows (or thinks) they're correct.
A confident person gives compliments to others.
An arrogant person gives compliments to themselves and/or critiques the flaws of others.
A confident person jokes good-naturedly and builds rapport by reading social cues, apologizing when they cross the line, and avoiding sensitive issues.
An arrogant person "negs" or otherwise undermines people by exploiting their weaknesses for humor.
A confident man adheres to traditional guidelines of chivalry.
An arrogant man adheres to traditional expectations of male/female power dynamics.
Anonymous wrote:A confident person says hello. Smiles. Makes conversation. Engages with you. Cracks a joke. Seems genuinely interested in what you have to say. Finds common ground, common interests, to talk to you about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The classically handsome guy.
Certain things can be taught.
Ugly is ugly.
You can't polish a turd.
Anonymous wrote:The classically handsome guy.
Certain things can be taught.
Ugly is ugly.
Anonymous wrote:The classically handsome guy.
Certain things can be taught.
Ugly is ugly.
Anonymous wrote:The classically handsome guy.
Certain things can be taught.
Ugly is ugly.