Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contractors have been cashing in for years. Cry me a river,
Contractors have been providing the services that the Feds can't seem to do on their own.
Like writing the software for the new insurance exchanges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contractors have been cashing in for years. Cry me a river,
Contractors have been providing the services that the Feds can't seem to do on their own.
josey23 wrote:As others have noted, employees at contractors are pretty much stuck in this situation. Great if the company can shift you to non-federal work but these companies are less diversified than you may think; my old employer had over 5000 people and was 98% dependent on the federal government.
As for the labor rates, there is a stunning difference between the rate billed to the government and the number on the employee's paycheck. I don't know where all that money goes but they toss you overboard pretty quick if you stop billing hours.
Anonymous wrote:josey23 wrote:As others have noted, employees at contractors are pretty much stuck in this situation. Great if the company can shift you to non-federal work but these companies are less diversified than you may think; my old employer had over 5000 people and was 98% dependent on the federal government.
As for the labor rates, there is a stunning difference between the rate billed to the government and the number on the employee's paycheck. I don't know where all that money goes but they toss you overboard pretty quick if you stop billing hours.
I think this is a weakness of certain contractors that is not the responsibility of the government to cure. Any consulting/contracting firm that is not diversified runs this risk, Fed contractor or not. Too much dependence on a key client is a well known business risk and you have to consider that when you take the job.
josey23 wrote:As others have noted, employees at contractors are pretty much stuck in this situation. Great if the company can shift you to non-federal work but these companies are less diversified than you may think; my old employer had over 5000 people and was 98% dependent on the federal government.
As for the labor rates, there is a stunning difference between the rate billed to the government and the number on the employee's paycheck. I don't know where all that money goes but they toss you overboard pretty quick if you stop billing hours.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I understand. But I have a family too. And for the poster who said "Cry me a river" I am not the contractor company, I'm just an employee! I don't "make millions for years."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contractors have been cashing in for years. Cry me a river,
Contractors have been providing the services that the Feds can't seem to do on their own.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I understand. But I have a family too. And for the poster who said "Cry me a river" I am not the contractor company, I'm just an employee! I don't "make millions for years."
Anonymous wrote:Because your company has the option of using you to work on other projects. Some company's are doing just that. Your company can also choose to pay you, they just cannot bill the government for it. If they billed the government for it, they would be asking for a hand out and the Republicans would not allow that. The big reason for outsourcing is to save the government money, including being able to not pay people when their services are not needed. Your services are not needed, so your are not getting paid. The federal Government is not your employer.