Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP. is this from recent experience? My understanding is that even with teh school supporting and a good consultant, the central office is under a lot of pressure to reduce private placements and come up with alternatives in the system -- even if the local school is supporting a private placement.
And, it's about time.
Says the ignorant parent.
Says the dc taxpayer since 1990 who is tired of paying millions of dollars to send too many kids to private school.
It used to be almost automatic, back in the 90s-To-late-Tony-Williams era. DCPS accounted for almost all of Lab Schools operating budget back then.
Now it's very difficult, and much scrutiny is given to claims that there isn't one single placement that could work (before the checkbook comes out for $50,000 a year) This is great for the whole.
Anonymous wrote:NP here. Sympathetic to this position. DC paying for private placements wouldn't bother me so much if the funding hadn't gone disproportionately to higher income families who know how to work the system. This should be hard to get.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP. is this from recent experience? My understanding is that even with teh school supporting and a good consultant, the central office is under a lot of pressure to reduce private placements and come up with alternatives in the system -- even if the local school is supporting a private placement.
And, it's about time.
Says the ignorant parent.
Says the dc taxpayer since 1990 who is tired of paying millions of dollars to send too many kids to private school.
It used to be almost automatic, back in the 90s-To-late-Tony-Williams era. DCPS accounted for almost all of Lab Schools operating budget back then.
Now it's very difficult, and much scrutiny is given to claims that there isn't one single placement that could work (before the checkbook comes out for $50,000 a year) This is great for the whole.
Anonymous wrote:Be very cautious with special ed attorneys and consultants.
They are often way to optimistic and don't present a realist view of what is happening in these cases. Since Gray entered office, there have been a tremendous cutback of private funding, even in solid cases.
If attorneys presented a realistic scenario, they'd scare aware
Clients.
If you don't have independent testing and advocates/therapists to testify about your child, you will never win. Bringing a case will easily cost 20K (attorney's fees, expert testimony, independent testing, etc).
Even if you prevail, no one wins funding for more than one year-you have to continue a lengthy, stressful and expensive case EVERY year.
In the end, even if you win against a system stacked against you, you may come ahead by $10-$15K each year once all fees have been paid. Most attorney's fees are well above what DC will reimburse if you win.
These cases are time consuming and stressful for families. DCPS drags things out as much as possible to cost you more legal fees, hoping you'll give up.
If it were a one time thing, maybe it would be worth it but having to repeat the inevitable insanity every year is not worth it!
NP here. Sympathetic to this position. DC paying for private placements wouldn't bother me so much if the funding hadn't gone disproportionately to higher income families who know how to work the system. This should be hard to get.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP. is this from recent experience? My understanding is that even with teh school supporting and a good consultant, the central office is under a lot of pressure to reduce private placements and come up with alternatives in the system -- even if the local school is supporting a private placement.
And, it's about time.
Says the ignorant parent.
Says the dc taxpayer since 1990 who is tired of paying millions of dollars to send too many kids to private school.
It used to be almost automatic, back in the 90s-To-late-Tony-Williams era. DCPS accounted for almost all of Lab Schools operating budget back then.
Now it's very difficult, and much scrutiny is given to claims that there isn't one single placement that could work (before the checkbook comes out for $50,000 a year) This is great for the whole.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP. is this from recent experience? My understanding is that even with teh school supporting and a good consultant, the central office is under a lot of pressure to reduce private placements and come up with alternatives in the system -- even if the local school is supporting a private placement.
And, it's about time.
Says the ignorant parent.
Says the dc taxpayer since 1990 who is tired of paying millions of dollars to send too many kids to private school.
It used to be almost automatic, back in the 90s-To-late-Tony-Williams era. DCPS accounted for almost all of Lab Schools operating budget back then.
Now it's very difficult, and much scrutiny is given to claims that there isn't one single placement that could work (before the checkbook comes out for $50,000 a year) This is great for the whole.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is in a private now (we pay and it's hard). It is cheaper to education him in private than in public and there was no appropriate public option, but DCPS sure wasn't going to fund him anywhere. I would estimate that he cost about $60K/year in public with an aide. His private is $38K. He's a tough kid to educate, but he's definitely better off in the private, despite the best efforts of DCPS, ha ha. It is hard to figure out a private that fits when the kid isn't just straight forward LD or autism with no behaviors so look very carefully at where you choose.
We and some other people we know had no success in our forays into trying to get funded, despite some officials stating that there was no appropriate placement for our child in DCPS. We didn't go all out fight, but it was very clear that if we had, it would not have been an easy win, if we had won at all. We opted to save the legal fees to at least eek out 1 year of private (they would be about the same).
Oh, and we have outside testing and lawyers and all the things that one should do to win.
Anonymous wrote:No it's not. It's not great for the child who is spends years wasting away in a DCPS classroom not learning a damn thing. Our kids are not guinea pigs, you either have well trained professionals in classrooms or you don't, but don't ask me to "stick with you" while you spend the entire school year trying to train yet another goner of a teacher in ABA, etc. Until DC is actually able to provide a placement that truly fits the individual's needs rather than to try to cut corners and check of the compliance list, there will still be kids falling through the cracks.
I'm fairly certain that my kid costs DCPS as much as it would if he was in a private setting at this point. It works for now, and I am a very involved and informed parent who is all for change in the system, but if the day comes that my son can no longer receive FAPE through DCPS, I am going hold DCPS accountable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP. is this from recent experience? My understanding is that even with teh school supporting and a good consultant, the central office is under a lot of pressure to reduce private placements and come up with alternatives in the system -- even if the local school is supporting a private placement.
And, it's about time.
Says the ignorant parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP. is this from recent experience? My understanding is that even with teh school supporting and a good consultant, the central office is under a lot of pressure to reduce private placements and come up with alternatives in the system -- even if the local school is supporting a private placement.
And, it's about time.