Anonymous wrote:It, like Pride and Prejudice, is a well-written archetypal romance novel. Strong heroine, pining hero who won't declare how he feels who saves the heroine from disaster without the heroine knowing it, heroine who at first believes she hates the hero, etc. Even with all the other parts, it appeals to the romantic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It portrays a strong feminist character.
Not quite.
The book's prose is actually not the greatest, but it is a sweeping saga, iconic characters that immortalized by the movie. The movie is a classic.
Sorry PP but you're wrong.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a massive classic movie fan but GWTW and Casablanca are so overrated.
There are a lot better films from that period or on TCM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well written book. Books are neither moral nor immoral but poorly or well written.
+1. My favorite novel since I was 12, I've read it probably 20 times. You do have to look past the racism. I just take it as a reflection of what attitudes were at the time. If you have critical thinking skills, this is not difficult.
Anonymous wrote:It's a great book. Other favorite rereads of mine are Dr Zhivago and Outlander.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It portrays a strong feminist character.
Not quite.
The book's prose is actually not the greatest, but it is a sweeping saga, iconic characters that immortalized by the movie. The movie is a classic.
Anonymous wrote:It portrays a strong feminist character.