Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I inherited $50k, put it in Vanguard Wellington fund, and am now ignoring it.
I inherited $140k two years ago and have done nothing with it, but want to do something.
Why/how did you choose Vanguard Wellington?
Not PP but Wellington is a great balanced fund with a lifetime return of more than 8%. Really solid fund for both bull and bear markets, and relatively low fees for an actively managed fund. I have about $20K in it myself and add to it regularly.
Anonymous wrote:It depends (of course). Do you already have ample retirement savings and an eight month emergency fund? Do you have high interest debts? What is your home situation-rent, own, mortgage, thinking you need something bigger someday?
All of these issues would take proirity over spending it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I inherited $50k, put it in Vanguard Wellington fund, and am now ignoring it.
I inherited $140k two years ago and have done nothing with it, but want to do something.
Why/how did you choose Vanguard Wellington?
Anonymous wrote:I'm about to receive a $500k inheritance. My original plan was to pay off my car loan and our HELOC ($50k total for both), keep $50k to play with, and save/invest the $400k with an eye toward quitting work or cutting way back ASAP. Wouldn't pay off our mortgage, though, since the 3 5/8 rate is lower than what we could potentially make investing. And we have no other debt.
No kids, though.
But it's possible some of the inheritance could be, if I choose, in the form of a long-held family house and/or property two time zones away. So I will have to decide whether I want some or all of the real estate instead of some or all of the cash.
My mind changes every day. What would other people do in this situation?
Anonymous wrote:I inherited $50k, put it in Vanguard Wellington fund, and am now ignoring it.
Anonymous wrote:Invest in BRK/B and let Warren Buffett manage your money for you. Your investment will appreciate nicely and because they pay no dividends you'll have no annual tax consequence. You really will be able to put it away and forget about it knowing it is appreciating in value and it will without question be there sometime in the future when it's needed.
Berkshire is the best bet out there for anyone who wants to invest, but is not watching the markets closely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would take 10% or so and buy something I've always wanted. The rest would go straight into retirement.
How can $60k go into a retirement account? IRA has a $5500 cap. 401ks/pension/profit sharing are tied to work + have a lower limit...?
I didn't say a tax-deferred retirement account. The majority of our retirement savings are not tax-deferred.
Then they are just general long term savings.
Isn't that the same thing? I'm 48. Long term pretty much equals retirement.
No, it isn't the same because retirement grows at a tax deferred income rate and long term savings does not. The difference being that presumably your tax rate upon retirement is much lower than your tax rate pre=retirement. Therefore your answer is: I'd save it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would take 10% or so and buy something I've always wanted. The rest would go straight into retirement.
How can $60k go into a retirement account? IRA has a $5500 cap. 401ks/pension/profit sharing are tied to work + have a lower limit...?
I didn't say a tax-deferred retirement account. The majority of our retirement savings are not tax-deferred.
Then they are just general long term savings.
Isn't that the same thing? I'm 48. Long term pretty much equals retirement.
.