Anonymous wrote:Because it is a sacred, religious ceremony about joining two people together to start a new family unit. Same as not having cameras at a funeral.
Plus cameras distract (as you can hear in the video, which is tres annoying to everyone in the church) from the solemnity of the occasion. This was the rule in most, if not all Catholic, Episcopalian, Anglican and some other Christian denominations until things started to break down. When I married it was a clear-cut rule. No cameras in the church. And I'm glad we did it that way. I have plenty of photos before and after and at the reception. Even when our son was baptized a few years back the episcopalian priest said "no photos; no photographer". But a friend discretely snapped a quickie with her cell phone for me.

Anonymous wrote:I think the same person is repeatedly posting.
I have NEVER heard of no photogs at a wedding.
If you don't want them that is fine, but acting like it is a sin is a whole 'nother matter.
If the officiant asked for it to stop, they should have stopped.
But is this some new trend?
I have been to plenty of church weddings with photogs and those people felt their ceremony was sacred and they loved the Lord just as much as anyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what is this no pictures in a church rule , wtf
No, you can have pictures taken in the church. Just not during the actual ceremony. Can you understand the difference?
The ceremony is exactly that, a ceremony. It's not a performance.