Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm actually shocked that the numbers are so low (or as expensive as these schools are and how "elite" their students are supposed to be).
Most of the numbers make sense to me. Most public schools in the area have a little over 1% of students qualifying as NMSFs. That seems about right to me because NMSFs are generally about 1% of students nationwide, and the public schools in our area are considered better than the nationwide average. So by comparison, a private school like Maret or CESJDS with 5% NMSFs has about five times as many NMSFs as the national average, which seems pretty impressive. And when you get to the most competitive private schools with 10-15% NMSFs, they're sitting pretty far above the average (and pretty comparable to top boarding and day school programs in other cities). And at the very top of the scale you see magnets like Blair and TJ. For those, I think a big driver in their NMSF success is that they select students in 9th grade based on a test that's a lot like the PSAT, so naturally those same students will perform well when they take the actual PSAT two years later.
Anonymous wrote:I'm actually shocked that the numbers are so low (or as expensive as these schools are and how "elite" their students are supposed to be).
Anonymous wrote:Probably silly question -- but if you live in one jurisdiction, but attend school in another, are you eligible? i.e., are VA students who attend private school in DC eligible? and is it based on DC's threshold or VA's threshold?
I'm actually shocked that the numbers are so low (or as expensive as these schools are and how "elite" their students are supposed to be).
Anonymous wrote:Why does this matter at all? I've never seen ANY correlation of national merit scholar status to career success. College placement is plainly a better indicator of student success.
... In other words, these results provide evidence for the validity of the NMSP selection process in that students who advance to higher levels of recognition earn higher
grades in college. ... In summary, the results indicate that National Merit Scholarship Program recognition levels are positively related to both FYGPA and retention to the second year of college. Not only do the mean FYGPA and second-year retention rates follow an increasing trend as recognition level increases, but there are also statistically signi?cant differences between recognition levels, and each difference comparison was associated with a small-to-medium effect size.
http://research.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/publications/2012/7/researchreport-2011-10-college-performance-national-merit-scholarship-recognition.pdf
Anonymous wrote:I'm actually shocked that the numbers are so low (or as expensive as these schools are and how "elite" their students are supposed to be).
I'm not surprised. When you really look at the numbers and think about it, one of the reasons the numbers in DC privates is relatively high -- not low -- is that the public schools historically were not viewed as good alternatives for strong students. The Montgomery County NMSF numbers in privates tends to be lower than DC privates because of the availability of both magnets and publics that are perceived as strong options. I suspect that Charles E. Smith tends to be the highest in MoCo because more families that elect that school are doing so because they want the Judaic curriculum that is not available in public school, but if you look at other privates the numbers are lower.
The other reason the privates numbers are not higher is because the numbers validate that most DC-area privates do not pretend to really be exclusively about the best and brightest as defined by test scores (even if parents want to think otherwise). Magnet programs generally accept students based almost entirely upon test scores and/or previous grades. In MoCo, for example, I believe they are permitted to consider gender but not any other type of diversity -- at least that was the rule for the middle school magnets when I attended open houses. Moreover, I don't believe anyone has an edge at the magnets based on his/her ability to play a sport, sing opera, act, or play an instrument, or based on legacy status, high profile parents, ability to make substantial contributions to the school, etc. I am not suggesting these are necessarily bad things -- private schools can't function without revenues and you can't have a sports team or a band without a certain number of students willing and able to play -- but the magnet school and private school experiences are just very different in ways outside of the purely academic realm.
Anonymous wrote:And here's a list that has the private schools in Montgomery County. None at Bullis, one at Landon, three at Holton, two at Georgetown Prep, seven at Charles E. Smith:
http://connectedcommunities.us/showthread.php?t=57593
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was surprised by Richard Montgomery -- most semifinalists ever, and way above their average number of semifinalists. Must be serving brain food in the cafeteria now.
It's a magnet school.
Anonymous wrote:I was surprised by Richard Montgomery -- most semifinalists ever, and way above their average number of semifinalists. Must be serving brain food in the cafeteria now.