Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do WOHMs have a plan? So many state that they need the two incomes in the DC area. What would YOU do with just your one income?
This is 14:38 - this is exactly my point on the job. If I got one now it would still be a lower paying, less time intensive and stressful one so that we could actually have a functioning family (two parents in big law didn't work out). So how would this be different if I had that job now or just got it later if I divorced?
Anonymous wrote:Do WOHMs have a plan? So many state that they need the two incomes in the DC area. What would YOU do with just your one income?
Anonymous wrote:Do WOHMs have a plan? So many state that they need the two incomes in the DC area. What would YOU do with just your one income?
Anonymous wrote:I get the question, but if we were both working to support a 2 income lifestyle we would have major adjusting and downsizing to do if one of us became ill and unable to work (multiple sclerosis, ALS, major trauma from car accident, etc). We would have to live on less and make major adjustments. Same as if something happened to my husband while I SAH. Live on much less, make major adjustments. Bottom line for me: it is 100% that if I work I will get to see my kids only a couple hours a day. The odds of sudden death, disability or divorce are far less (I'm sure someone will know the stats on here!) . I'm not going to trade a known for an unknown
Anonymous wrote:Life insurance is a good idea.
As far as divorce...I don't plan for it. Seriously. The way we make our marriage work is that we are both in it 100%, no contingency plans. And I wouldn't stay home if I wasn't sure about that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I never thought about that until I moved here and heard women's opinions on sahms. I find it a non-issue. If we got a divorce I'd take half and child support. I work in a field where I could pick up where I left off with no problem.
What? Not if he had a good lawyer, idiot. Half of what?? Maybe half of what was earned during the marriage and half of savings, etc.? But why on earth do you think you could "live" on child support after? And how on earth do you "know" you could pick up right where you left off?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I never thought about that until I moved here and heard women's opinions on sahms. I find it a non-issue. If we got a divorce I'd take half and child support. I work in a field where I could pick up where I left off with no problem.
What? Not if he had a good lawyer, idiot. Half of what?? Maybe half of what was earned during the marriage and half of savings, etc.? But why on earth do you think you could "live" on child support after? And how on earth do you "know" you could pick up right where you left off?
So DCUM: the thread was not about evaluating people's plans. It was asking what the plan was. The PP may not have sound plans, but your comprehension also falls into the idiot category.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I never thought about that until I moved here and heard women's opinions on sahms. I find it a non-issue. If we got a divorce I'd take half and child support. I work in a field where I could pick up where I left off with no problem.
What? Not if he had a good lawyer, idiot. Half of what?? Maybe half of what was earned during the marriage and half of savings, etc.? But why on earth do you think you could "live" on child support after? And how on earth do you "know" you could pick up right where you left off?
Anonymous wrote:I never thought about that until I moved here and heard women's opinions on sahms. I find it a non-issue. If we got a divorce I'd take half and child support. I work in a field where I could pick up where I left off with no problem.