Anonymous wrote: Especially since net worth, not HHI, would make one "rich."
Anonymous wrote:The biggest issue is housing cost. If you bought before 2002 you should be fine living in mid 150s, if you bought later you will need double that for the same home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The irs considers over 450k hhi rich. In our area under that is upper middle but it also depends on assets
I've never seen the IRS code reference or define "rich".
Anonymous wrote:$1.2M or so. Don't consider myself rich. Multiply that by 10 - where arguably a $300K+ a year income is achievable on the interest alone and I'd consider myself rich. (To me being rich means not having to work for a living)
Anonymous wrote:what if you make 300k hhi and have no assets , are you rich
Anonymous wrote:The irs considers over 450k hhi rich. In our area under that is upper middle but it also depends on assets
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$1.2M or so. Don't consider myself rich. Multiply that by 10 - where arguably a $300K+ a year income is achievable on the interest alone and I'd consider myself rich. (To me being rich means not having to work for a living)
+1 on living off of interest/investments would make me feel rich too - and about the same amount as the pp as to the ideal goal number
+2. This is about our net worth and I still worry about having enough money.
Anonymous wrote:How much do you think living DC area that one considers him/her self rich? $2M? $4M? $10M?