Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What's your skill set and what are your natural tendencies? While both have an international focus, how do you like to approach an issue? If you want to make policy and in most cases deal with "what should be", you go State. If you like looking at things to see "what is", you go CIA.
CIA has the edge on support staff. Their support staff actually try to see how to get things done, rather than look for ways to say no. They also have more money, although with sequester all government offices are hurting.
This is a very interesting answer. I'm not OP but do you mind telling us your background (basis of knowledge)? I always thought I would love working for the CIA (as a romanticizing teen) but I'm way past feasability now. Just curious.
OP here -- It wasn't for me, but for my fiance. My father worked CIA in the 80s and always said that, when stationed abroad, CIA had the bigger houses in the consulate, had more leeway in selecting what they wanted to do, better benefits, better workplace, etc. I told fiance this and he doesn't believe it and thinks that it's outdated. It might be! It's totally anecdotal, anyway.
Fiance is trying to secure a job in the intelligence community when he graduates this May. He (and I) wants to work abroad, either with State or the CIA, but is leaning more towards State. I know it's a complete apples-and-oranges question, I was just wondering if anyone had any quick and dirty opinions.