Anonymous wrote:16;09 - YOU NAILED IT.
OP, how much are you looking to spend? Are you thinking you will buy new? Is walkability mandatory? Your choices seem rather limited. I have many friends who own more than one house, at least one of which is in McLean.
There are plenty of "last generation McLean people" that are practically priced out of McLean as it is. They will be damned if they will let downtown development price them out completely.
If you know anything about the "knock down neighborhoods" - where knock downs are well underway, you will know that those who can barely afford to be in McLean are putting on (practically) makeshift additions, instead of the economically wiser knock down/rebuild choice. In many cases, they look not unlike the trailers that are added on in the poorer areas. They just keep going, looking at the back of their house. It looks horrible, but they are proud to just be there, I suppose.
Most people I know would far prefer to have new construction to look at every morning, even if it is out their window.
It is not a choice for the "last McLean generation", as they can barely afford the "old house" taxes, and can certainly NOT take on the "new house" taxes. They fight change in a rather hostile and sneaky manner. Of course, they would never admit this. But they are one tax payment away from moving elsewhere, fast.
It won't be long before the knock downs/rebuilds are the majority, and the "old house contingent" will have far less choices. The latter knows this.
It is an interesting aspect of McLean economics that few people see from the inside, and fewer admit.
Understandably, it is a sensitive issue, both amongst the "old house contingent" and when young couples easily get outbid by builders, since the latter consistently has cash in hand.
You might feel more comfortable in a neighborhood with less unspoken animosity.
Anonymous wrote:Or StarNut, Greenberry's, Sweet Leaf for coffee. All on or near Chain Bridge.
In general, McLean homes are more, not less, expensive than North Arlington properties. The more affordable areas will be off Great Falls or Westmoreland south of Chain Bridge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for all of the input. I took a drive out to McLean and went to the "town center" Giant. Stopped by Starbucks and StarNut. It's not what I was hoping for, but I'm just happy for a neighborhoody Starbucks. I also saw that there were plans in 2010 to redo the "town center", but the owner's were gun shy due to the recession. Does anyone know if they've changed their mind for the upcoming future? Also, how does the area expect to change with the completion of the Tyson's projects? I really prefer Arlington because of Clarendon, etc... however; for the square footage we want (I want to feel like I have more space after living sandwiched in between to other families in a rowhouse for 12 years), we're priced out. You can actually get more land for your buck in McLean in some of the more modest neighborhoods. What I want would cost upwards of 1.5 to 2 mil. in Arlington. It ain't happenin'!!!
McLean resident here. They weren't gun shy due to recession. There was strong opposition in McLean from the business that have been here for 20+ yrs. THere was no recession in most of McLean.
You can be in Arlington in 15 minutes, or in Tysons. Or in G-town. You just can't really walk anywhere, but Arlington is the same unless you live in the Rosslyn/Clarendon/Ballston corridor. BTW, the desirable areas of McLean, the houses are over $1.5m, so not sure how you're priced out of Arlington but not here. You'll be looking around Westmoreland, towards that area, I think. Houses there aren't sitting on an acre, either.
OP here. Thanks for this info. I read some articles that discussed Dan Montgomery and his portfolio ownership of 30+ business in the McLean business corridor (the town center). The articles were pretty vague, but they stated that the economy is what drove redevelopment to a standstill. Do you have more of an inside scoop or is there another story floating around. I know you mentioned the businesses were opposed, but which ones? I'm trying to get to the real story to see if the fact that Tyson's will be on a major real estate upswing that will impact the micro-economy positively, will give Dan Montgomery the uptick he needs to go forward with redevelopment. Anyways, I'm looking for a teardown in $850-950 range with a decent amount of land to it. There much more of this possibility here than in Arlington.
Anonymous wrote:
Agreed. If you ever drive to the giant / cvs it's shocking and scary to see all the old white people attempting to drive, they fill the entire parking lot.
Anonymous wrote:16:34 - I think your perspective is a bit exaggerated.
There are plenty of additions all over Arlington as well. They didn't stop just because Arlington got more expensive with redevelopment along the Orange Lne. If people like the location, and have finite budgets, they may choose an addition rather than tear down an older house and build new. Sometimes the additions are very nice and sometimes they are not. Local zoning codes allow this, even if some would prefer more new construction. If you want to live in an HOA neighborhood, Ashburn is probably a better bet than most of Arlington or McLean.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for all of the input. I took a drive out to McLean and went to the "town center" Giant. Stopped by Starbucks and StarNut. It's not what I was hoping for, but I'm just happy for a neighborhoody Starbucks. I also saw that there were plans in 2010 to redo the "town center", but the owner's were gun shy due to the recession. Does anyone know if they've changed their mind for the upcoming future? Also, how does the area expect to change with the completion of the Tyson's projects? I really prefer Arlington because of Clarendon, etc... however; for the square footage we want (I want to feel like I have more space after living sandwiched in between to other families in a rowhouse for 12 years), we're priced out. You can actually get more land for your buck in McLean in some of the more modest neighborhoods. What I want would cost upwards of 1.5 to 2 mil. in Arlington. It ain't happenin'!!!
McLean resident here. They weren't gun shy due to recession. There was strong opposition in McLean from the business that have been here for 20+ yrs. THere was no recession in most of McLean.
You can be in Arlington in 15 minutes, or in Tysons. Or in G-town. You just can't really walk anywhere, but Arlington is the same unless you live in the Rosslyn/Clarendon/Ballston corridor. BTW, the desirable areas of McLean, the houses are over $1.5m, so not sure how you're priced out of Arlington but not here. You'll be looking around Westmoreland, towards that area, I think. Houses there aren't sitting on an acre, either.

Anonymous wrote:16;09 - YOU NAILED IT.
OP, how much are you looking to spend? Are you thinking you will buy new? Is walkability mandatory? Your choices seem rather limited. I have many friends who own more than one house, at least one of which is in McLean.
There are plenty of "last generation McLean people" that are practically priced out of McLean as it is. They will be damned if they will let downtown development price them out completely.
If you know anything about the "knock down neighborhoods" - where knock downs are well underway, you will know that those who can barely afford to be in McLean are putting on (practically) makeshift additions, instead of the economically wiser knock down/rebuild choice. In many cases, they look not unlike the trailers that are added on in the poorer areas. They just keep going, looking at the back of their house. It looks horrible, but they are proud to just be there, I suppose.
Most people I know would far prefer to have new construction to look at every morning, even if it is out their window.
It is not a choice for the "last McLean generation", as they can barely afford the "old house" taxes, and can certainly NOT take on the "new house" taxes. They fight change in a rather hostile and sneaky manner. Of course, they would never admit this. But they are one tax payment away from moving elsewhere, fast.
It won't be long before the knock downs/rebuilds are the majority, and the "old house contingent" will have far less choices. The latter knows this.
It is an interesting aspect of McLean economics that few people see from the inside, and fewer admit.
Understandably, it is a sensitive issue, both amongst the "old house contingent" and when young couples easily get outbid by builders, since the latter consistently has cash in hand.
You might feel more comfortable in a neighborhood with less unspoken animosity.
Anonymous wrote:
McLean resident here. They weren't gun shy due to recession. There was strong opposition in McLean from the business that have been here for 20+ yrs. THere was no recession in most of McLean.
You can be in Arlington in 15 minutes, or in Tysons. Or in G-town. You just can't really walk anywhere, but Arlington is the same unless you live in the Rosslyn/Clarendon/Ballston corridor. BTW, the desirable areas of McLean, the houses are over $1.5m, so not sure how you're priced out of Arlington but not here. You'll be looking around Westmoreland, towards that area, I think. Houses there aren't sitting on an acre, either.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for all of the input. I took a drive out to McLean and went to the "town center" Giant. Stopped by Starbucks and StarNut. It's not what I was hoping for, but I'm just happy for a neighborhoody Starbucks. I also saw that there were plans in 2010 to redo the "town center", but the owner's were gun shy due to the recession. Does anyone know if they've changed their mind for the upcoming future? Also, how does the area expect to change with the completion of the Tyson's projects? I really prefer Arlington because of Clarendon, etc... however; for the square footage we want (I want to feel like I have more space after living sandwiched in between to other families in a rowhouse for 12 years), we're priced out. You can actually get more land for your buck in McLean in some of the more modest neighborhoods. What I want would cost upwards of 1.5 to 2 mil. in Arlington. It ain't happenin'!!!
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for all of the input. I took a drive out to McLean and went to the "town center" Giant. Stopped by Starbucks and StarNut. It's not what I was hoping for, but I'm just happy for a neighborhoody Starbucks. I also saw that there were plans in 2010 to redo the "town center", but the owner's were gun shy due to the recession. Does anyone know if they've changed their mind for the upcoming future? Also, how does the area expect to change with the completion of the Tyson's projects? I really prefer Arlington because of Clarendon, etc... however; for the square footage we want (I want to feel like I have more space after living sandwiched in between to other families in a rowhouse for 12 years), we're priced out. You can actually get more land for your buck in McLean in some of the more modest neighborhoods. What I want would cost upwards of 1.5 to 2 mil. in Arlington. It ain't happenin'!!!
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for all of the input. I took a drive out to McLean and went to the "town center" Giant. Stopped by Starbucks and StarNut. It's not what I was hoping for, but I'm just happy for a neighborhoody Starbucks. I also saw that there were plans in 2010 to redo the "town center", but the owner's were gun shy due to the recession. Does anyone know if they've changed their mind for the upcoming future? Also, how does the area expect to change with the completion of the Tyson's projects? I really prefer Arlington because of Clarendon, etc... however; for the square footage we want (I want to feel like I have more space after living sandwiched in between to other families in a rowhouse for 12 years), we're priced out. You can actually get more land for your buck in McLean in some of the more modest neighborhoods. What I want would cost upwards of 1.5 to 2 mil. in Arlington. It ain't happenin'!!!