Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, if Hillary (or Biden) had dual citizenship, the right would not accept the "simple act of renouncing" as sufficient.
Yes, Ted Cruz is running. In 3 years. It's ridiculous that we're even talking about this.
You're wrong about that. The problem the right has with Obama is his haughtiness, which causes him no end of problems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It matters not what anyone thinks. What matters is what the Constitution says. All Cruz has to do is renounce his Canadian citizenship (he has dual).
That's got nothing to do with the birther argument, which was that a person is not a natural-born citizen if he is born on foreign soil to a US citizen. The attacks on the legitimacy of the Obama presidency were not predicated on the belief that he was a Kenyan citizen, they were predicated on the (mistaken) belief that he was born in Kenya.
(Actually, they were predicated on the belief that he was a black socialist Muslim who spend a lot of time in a Christian church where his pastor indoctrinated him with anti-American views. But he's Muslim. But I digress.)
Note that I believe "natural-born citizen" means a citizen from birth, which makes Cruz eligible to be president. But is sure is fun watching the wingnuts squirm.
Actually, the problems were caused by Obama's own behavior - and they continue.
Believe it or not, conservatives are much more concerned with his affiliation with Wright than any time he spent in a Muslim country. Conservatives issues with Obama/Muslim is how naive he is in dealing with the significant issues. It's like Carter redux in so many ways.
Anonymous wrote:takoma wrote:Since Obama's father's supposed Muslim religion (he was an atheist) is such a big deal to many birthers, I'm surprised Cruz's father being Cuban does not send them looking for his true Communist feelings under that right-wing facade.
Cubans are all liberty-loving heroes for leaving, didn't you know?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It matters not what anyone thinks. What matters is what the Constitution says. All Cruz has to do is renounce his Canadian citizenship (he has dual).
That's got nothing to do with the birther argument, which was that a person is not a natural-born citizen if he is born on foreign soil to a US citizen. The attacks on the legitimacy of the Obama presidency were not predicated on the belief that he was a Kenyan citizen, they were predicated on the (mistaken) belief that he was born in Kenya.
(Actually, they were predicated on the belief that he was a black socialist Muslim who spend a lot of time in a Christian church where his pastor indoctrinated him with anti-American views. But he's Muslim. But I digress.)
Note that I believe "natural-born citizen" means a citizen from birth, which makes Cruz eligible to be president. But is sure is fun watching the wingnuts squirm.
Anonymous wrote:Again, if Hillary (or Biden) had dual citizenship, the right would not accept the "simple act of renouncing" as sufficient.
Yes, Ted Cruz is running. In 3 years. It's ridiculous that we're even talking about this.
takoma wrote:Since Obama's father's supposed Muslim religion (he was an atheist) is such a big deal to many birthers, I'm surprised Cruz's father being Cuban does not send them looking for his true Communist feelings under that right-wing facade.
Anonymous wrote:It matters not what anyone thinks. What matters is what the Constitution says. All Cruz has to do is renounce his Canadian citizenship (he has dual).
Anonymous wrote:It matters not what anyone thinks. What matters is what the Constitution says. All Cruz has to do is renounce his Canadian citizenship (he has dual).
Anonymous wrote:I guess the contrast between Cruz, of whom I am no big fan, and Obama is lost on you guys? Ted Cruz already released his birth certificate. It took Obama years to do this.
Now you can start your rant and call me a birther even though I've said nothing that would support that. I'm sure you left wingers won't disappoint.