Anonymous wrote:No, I sent OSSE an email at osse@dc.gov. I am also writing to my board member on the DC BOE. I suggest others do the same if they really want to see it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree! I don't think they should hide the data. I am an 8th grade science teacher in the District (and a parent of a PreK 4 charter student).
I am PP and I agree, but it seems like DC spends more time on aggregating data to fire teachers under IMPACT than on creating a solid curricula and working on a ensuring the teachers have all the resources possible to teach each child.
I don't think teacher assessment should take on a life of it's own but it's nonetheless important.
Why "create" solid curricula? Tons of solid curricula already exist out there, why reinvent the wheel?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not 6th, 7th and 9th?
5 is elementary, 8th is middle and 10th is high school. plus 6th and 9th are transition years for students assuming they aren't attending a pk to 8 or 6 to 12 school.
also dcum parent complain about how much time is devoted to testing, why advocate for more tests?
No, but if they already took the time to take the tests, at least give parents and students the results.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree! I don't think they should hide the data. I am an 8th grade science teacher in the District (and a parent of a PreK 4 charter student).
I am PP and I agree, but it seems like DC spends more time on aggregating data to fire teachers under IMPACT than on creating a solid curricula and working on a ensuring the teachers have all the resources possible to teach each child.