Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how the emergency fund isn't joint, if you are funding it from current income.
I'd do a divorce budget (lawyer costs, etc.) and a post-divorce living budget. I'd assume all assets get cut in half. For reasons cited above, I wouldn't count on that emergency fund.
Even if you stay married, assuming that you will want to live on 70 percent of your current HHI ($112,000), you will need about $2.8 million in savings. You can get there if you save $15,000 a year through age 65, and earn a 9 percent return on your investments. You can reduce the $2.8 million figure if you 1. have a pension, 2. count on social security, 3. can live on less. You can also save more.
I'd say the best financial investment you can make is to keep your marriage together. And start maxing out all of your retirement options. You say that your annual expenses are about $90k, but HHI is $160 - where does the rest go?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, I know I will.
I make 90% of the income. What else can I do?
Divorce does not seem financially feasible. Plus, the SAH has the edge in any custody battle. That would be great. Lose my money and my kids.
Once the kids are gone, with a good lawyer I may be able to argue that equitable does not mean equal in this case. But I know I will take a hit.
It's like I'm in this dark tunnel, and I can't see even a glimpse of light.
It looks like you are the bread winner, but married to the loser. It looks like you have saved a lot with your income.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, I know I will.
I make 90% of the income. What else can I do?
Divorce does not seem financially feasible. Plus, the SAH has the edge in any custody battle. That would be great. Lose my money and my kids.
Once the kids are gone, with a good lawyer I may be able to argue that equitable does not mean equal in this case. But I know I will take a hit.
It's like I'm in this dark tunnel, and I can't see even a glimpse of light.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, I know I will.
I make 90% of the income. What else can I do?
Divorce does not seem financially feasible. Plus, the SAH has the edge in any custody battle. That would be great. Lose my money and my kids.
Once the kids are gone, with a good lawyer I may be able to argue that equitable does not mean equal in this case. But I know I will take a hit.
It's like I'm in this dark tunnel, and I can't see even a glimpse of light.
Anonymous wrote:9:47 here. To clairify what I said, if you contribute to your 401K up to the match, your next step should be the Roth IRA. (I said contribute to your 401k to the max, I meant match)