Anonymous wrote:I would wait until you receive the offer.
Anonymous wrote:thanks, PP (OP here). At my CURRENT job, I plan on taking off 14 weeks because as a fed, I have all those lovely holidays in the winter (so that makes up a week) and I have a ton of sick/annual leave that I have saved up for this purpose - so it would be one week of fed holidays (lets call that a "free" week) and 13 weeks of combined sick and annual.
With a new job, I would (I think) be OK with 12 weeks, 10 if I had to but that wouldn't be easy. Yes this is my first (and probably only!) child.
I 110% plan on returning to work. We are on a huge number of day care lists, and have been since I was 6 weeks pregnant. If I do not have a slot, I will find or start a nanny share.
I will also be working (at this new job) a short walk from home.
I think I am passing as "chubby", but I'm not actively hiding anything. I'm not wearing pregnancy flattering clothes to these interviews (empire waistes, etc) And as I said, I'm not actively discussing it nor hiding it.
Assuming they can fire me if I start the job after disclosing during negotiations that I'm pregnant, I'd be screwed. But wouldn't it make more sense just to take back their offer?
Anonymous wrote:OP here - I completely agree, but I think negotiating job security at THIS point is more valuable than a significantly higher salary....no?
And I think it would be different if I were early or middle pregnancy - but I'm almost 26 weeks. So it's a very odd situation. I'm mostly worried about keeping the job.
This is why I'm torn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I would not agree to a lower salary in exchange for being allowed to take maternity leave. That seems like a very short-sighted decision. Maybe you could bake into your contract that your salary will be X for the first year, including however many months of parental leave, and that your second year, your salary would be X+whatever you would have been making before.
Do not screw yourself in the long term for unpaid leave.
I was considering doing this - a temporarly lower salary (still more than I make now, I'd hope) then a return to a higher one when I come back after leave.
And to be clear, I'm not mainly interested in the job for the money, I'm taking the job because it's a generally better job for what I'm best at, it's a much better commute, and it's not in the government.
but I'll look at it the way you lay it out - it's pretty clear.
Anonymous wrote:I definitely do plan on disclosing this once I get a formal offer (of course, this is an "if").
I do worry about the job market, but I think if I stay at THIS job, where there are anticipated RIFs and continued furloughs, I'll still be worried about stability.
I was under the impression that if the employer has more than 15 people, without a legitimate reason, it would be difficult for them to fire you during your leave. The PDA (pregnancy discrimination act) - they have to provide you the same accomodations and leave as they would someone with a disability, like a heart attack or whatnot.
(God, I can't believe I have to think of my pregnancy as a disability).
Anonymous wrote:OP, I would not agree to a lower salary in exchange for being allowed to take maternity leave. That seems like a very short-sighted decision. Maybe you could bake into your contract that your salary will be X for the first year, including however many months of parental leave, and that your second year, your salary would be X+whatever you would have been making before.
Do not screw yourself in the long term for unpaid leave.