Anonymous wrote:Kudos to you for explaining to your daughter that not getting into AAP doesnt mean you are dumb or vice versa.
If she got in, you should put her in. She is happy about it, why take that away from her. The program is great no doubt.
Anonymous wrote:So we submitted our daughter for AAP consideration in February without her knowing. She was found to be ineligible for Level IV. We appealed, again without her knowing. We received her eligibility determination yesterday. When we shared the news with her she was elated - literally crying tears of happiness. I have never seen her so happy (not even on Christmas Morning). As a parent, I had the same feelings - especially since her AART said she was "average" and not motivated and because she received a GBRS of 8 even though she consistently receives 4s.
Still, I was surprised by her reaction to the news. At the end of 2nd grade when she realized she did not get into AAP she shrugged it off as no big deal.
So when I asked her why she was so excited to find out she was in she said, "it's because I can be with my friends again and now people won't think I'm dumb".
I informed her that being in AAP doesn't mean she's smarter than anyone and it doesn't mean kids not in the program are "dumber" than those that are in the program.
When she went to bed last night I started thinking - AAP is great and as a parent we're fortunate to have the option within the public school system. However, is it worth the consequences? No child should be made to feel they are inferior - especially in their home school and in their neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You applied and were denied and you spent all th effort to appeal. You finally got your kid in. What are you worrying about now? That she will feel smart for getting in, or dumb compared to some of the real geniuses who will be in the class? OP - what is your gripe? And why would you start complaining about this 'tough' situation, when there are probably many on this board who are truly disappointed their DC didn't get in.
OP here. don't get me wrong. I'm happy for my child. My heart breaks however, at the thought that she ever doubted her intelligence and felt alienated in anyway.
It breaks my heart to think other kids feel the same way.
Many on this forum - frequently distinguish "gifted" from "smart" from "hard work". As adults we have opportunities to make up for deficiencies in one area by focusing on others. We recognize we can overcome difficulties and disadvantages. 8 and 9 year olds are not as equipped.
As a parent I had no clue my daughter felt that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:By 3rd grade, the kids are very well aware of who the smartest kids in the class are, with or without AAP.
Yes, but the AAP selection process doesn't necessarily get all the smart kids. There is a difference between gifted and smart. There are smart kids who are left behind and have to live with the stigma created by the large percentage of kids that end up in AAP. So many smart but not gifted kids get into the program that is does make it seem like only kids who are not smart stay in Gen Ed. DS is in AAP and was shocked when two of the most academically advanced kids in his class didn't also get in. I explained that the program was an opportunity for him to learn things in a different way and not that the kids in the program are smarter than the ones who don't go. I think there should be a program for profoundly gifted kids and all the other kids should be in gen ed and should have access to the current AAP curriculum. I don't think DS is profoundly gifted so this is not a self-serving suggestion.
Anonymous wrote:You applied and were denied and you spent all th effort to appeal. You finally got your kid in. What are you worrying about now? That she will feel smart for getting in, or dumb compared to some of the real geniuses who will be in the class? OP - what is your gripe? And why would you start complaining about this 'tough' situation, when there are probably many on this board who are truly disappointed their DC didn't get in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:By 3rd grade, the kids are very well aware of who the smartest kids in the class are, with or without AAP.
Yes, but the AAP selection process doesn't necessarily get all the smart kids. There is a difference between gifted and smart. There are smart kids who are left behind and have to live with the stigma created by the large percentage of kids that end up in AAP. So many smart but not gifted kids get into the program that is does make it seem like only kids who are not smart stay in Gen Ed. DS is in AAP and was shocked when two of the most academically advanced kids in his class didn't also get in. I explained that the program was an opportunity for him to learn things in a different way and not that the kids in the program are smarter than the ones who don't go. I think there should be a program for profoundly gifted kids and all the other kids should be in gen ed and should have access to the current AAP curriculum. I don't think DS is profoundly gifted so this is not a self-serving suggestion.