Anonymous wrote:So you do think poorly of people who (i) send their kids to OOB schools; (ii) send their kids to charter schools; and (iii) send their kids to private schools? Really? Yikes.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's lay it out there, super-raw, and have other people qualify it around the edges:
Hearst has way more black students from east-of-the-Park and way fewer children of families with $1M homes.
Slice, dice and qualify it, and I'm sure your friend wouldn't put it that way openly in 2013 in DC, but them's the breaks.
OP here. Thank you. This is actually what I suspected. I am reconsidering my opinion of this person. I don't know much about Hearst but this was my initial thought, just wanted to check with people who might know. People are endlessly disappointing me.
It's probably a little more nuanced than that - SES has a lot to do with it.
OP, if you find this distasteful, you must also find the many people who live east of the park and send their kids to charter schools distasteful as well. You're going to be pretty lonely if that's your criteria for friendship.
OP here. I would rather lonely than surrounded by racists or people who judge people solely on the basis of income (be it high or low!!).
So you do think poorly of people who (i) send their kids to OOB schools; (ii) send their kids to charter schools; and (iii) send their kids to private schools? Really? Yikes.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's lay it out there, super-raw, and have other people qualify it around the edges:
Hearst has way more black students from east-of-the-Park and way fewer children of families with $1M homes.
Slice, dice and qualify it, and I'm sure your friend wouldn't put it that way openly in 2013 in DC, but them's the breaks.
OP here. Thank you. This is actually what I suspected. I am reconsidering my opinion of this person. I don't know much about Hearst but this was my initial thought, just wanted to check with people who might know. People are endlessly disappointing me.
It's probably a little more nuanced than that - SES has a lot to do with it.
OP, if you find this distasteful, you must also find the many people who live east of the park and send their kids to charter schools distasteful as well. You're going to be pretty lonely if that's your criteria for friendship.
OP here. I would rather lonely than surrounded by racists or people who judge people solely on the basis of income (be it high or low!!).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP there's also the OOB factor. We considered a hearst-zoned school, but while we have no issue with the diversity or the student population there, Hearst is 88% OOB, which really makes it not a neighborhood school.
To me being able to walk to friends' houses, play in the alley with school buddies etc. is really important. It helps build the sense of community as well.
Hearst's figures suggest that won't happen.
Yes, I have heard this argument. If your children end up going to a private school this is also the case so this is a silly argument. In the end, you don't like the OOB kids because they are different. The subtext of the "neighborhood argument" is one of racism/classism.
I am in inbound Hearst family and I don't think this is quite fair. There's nothing wrong with wanting more friends in the neighborhood and it has nothing to do with race or class. Just proximity and convenience. It didn't stop me from going to the school, but that doesn't mean it's racist of me to try to encourage more local families to go to Hearst.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP there's also the OOB factor. We considered a hearst-zoned school, but while we have no issue with the diversity or the student population there, Hearst is 88% OOB, which really makes it not a neighborhood school.
To me being able to walk to friends' houses, play in the alley with school buddies etc. is really important. It helps build the sense of community as well.
Hearst's figures suggest that won't happen.
Yes, I have heard this argument. If your children end up going to a private school this is also the case so this is a silly argument. In the end, you don't like the OOB kids because they are different. The subtext of the "neighborhood argument" is one of racism/classism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One big distinction that I would make between Janney and Hearst is the infrastructure. Once Hearst gains a cafteria, gym etc. through the renovation, I'm sure more people will be interested.
In DC, it's more about fundamental needs such as the outcomes and culture (do I have to worry about my kid getting bullied or robbed) than it is about infrastructure. Let's not be under illusions of putting lipstick on a pig and calling it a day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One big distinction that I would make between Janney and Hearst is the infrastructure. Once Hearst gains a cafteria, gym etc. through the renovation, I'm sure more people will be interested.
In DC, it's more about fundamental needs such as the outcomes and culture (do I have to worry about my kid getting bullied or robbed) than it is about infrastructure. Let's not be under illusions of putting lipstick on a pig and calling it a day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's lay it out there, super-raw, and have other people qualify it around the edges:
Hearst has way more black students from east-of-the-Park and way fewer children of families with $1M homes.
Slice, dice and qualify it, and I'm sure your friend wouldn't put it that way openly in 2013 in DC, but them's the breaks.
OP here. Thank you. This is actually what I suspected. I am reconsidering my opinion of this person. I don't know much about Hearst but this was my initial thought, just wanted to check with people who might know. People are endlessly disappointing me.
It's probably a little more nuanced than that - SES has a lot to do with it.
OP, if you find this distasteful, you must also find the many people who live east of the park and send their kids to charter schools distasteful as well. You're going to be pretty lonely if that's your criteria for friendship.
OP here. I would rather lonely than surrounded by racists or people who judge people solely on the basis of income (be it high or low!!).
Anonymous wrote:One big distinction that I would make between Janney and Hearst is the infrastructure. Once Hearst gains a cafteria, gym etc. through the renovation, I'm sure more people will be interested.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's lay it out there, super-raw, and have other people qualify it around the edges:
Hearst has way more black students from east-of-the-Park and way fewer children of families with $1M homes.
Slice, dice and qualify it, and I'm sure your friend wouldn't put it that way openly in 2013 in DC, but them's the breaks.
OP here. Thank you. This is actually what I suspected. I am reconsidering my opinion of this person. I don't know much about Hearst but this was my initial thought, just wanted to check with people who might know. People are endlessly disappointing me.
It's probably a little more nuanced than that - SES has a lot to do with it.
OP, if you find this distasteful, you must also find the many people who live east of the park and send their kids to charter schools distasteful as well. You're going to be pretty lonely if that's your criteria for friendship.
Anonymous wrote:OP there's also the OOB factor. We considered a hearst-zoned school, but while we have no issue with the diversity or the student population there, Hearst is 88% OOB, which really makes it not a neighborhood school.
To me being able to walk to friends' houses, play in the alley with school buddies etc. is really important. It helps build the sense of community as well.
Hearst's figures suggest that won't happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well 83%
It's interesting to me that schools with very high OOB populations weren't considered for closing. If a school is designed to serve a neighborhood and less than 20% of the neighborhood is utilizing it, maybe they should close it.
. Sure the test scores were by DCPS standards good and by more objective standards closer to medicore.
I have no idea where this 20% number is coming from (that less than 20% of the neighborhood is utilizing it); is there some source for that? I am not aware of any statistics that can tell you what % of an in-bounds population actually go to the neighborhood school. 17% in bounds at the school does not mean that only 17% of in bounds families are choosing to go there. In fact the Hearst boundaries are quite small and I think it's conceivable that even if every elementary school-aged kid in the neighborhood went there it would only be at about capacity.
And I will just point out the obvious, which is that if more neighborhood families chose it it would become more of a neighborhood school.
Yo. Check out the DCPS school profiles, which include in-boundary numbers:
http://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/Hearst+Elementary+School
It's not exactly a state secret.