Anonymous wrote:This would never happen in vienna or mclean, the citizens would alert the police to a gang of youths running on to the metro train.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why you so mad...
If OP stopped being an idiot, I'd stop presenting actual facts to dispute him/her.
Why is op an idiot. I don't get how what he/she posted is idiotic.
The title of the thread is really explanation enough.
So no one got beaten by youths on a trail? I don't get your logic.
Are you slow or just willfully dense? OP is basically intimating with his/her title that people claim DC is great but hey! look! You can get beaten on a trail! As if this happens every day, which it doesn't. Whatever. All you pearl clutchers just hide in your suburban McMansions with guns trying not to pee your pants.![]()
Well the police have noted every other day reoccurring incidents on that trail. I don't think the local W&O trail has that issue so there is some type of problem in DC.
So is it your assertion, as it obviously is OP's, that there is some connection between a problem with crime on one particular trail and the "walkability" of the entire city? Please explain how the two things are related. This idiotic logic - conflating one incident or one area with the relative safety of an ENTIRE city - is what I have a problem with. It's just good-old fashioned stupidity and I don't like stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why you so mad...
If OP stopped being an idiot, I'd stop presenting actual facts to dispute him/her.
Why is op an idiot. I don't get how what he/she posted is idiotic.
The title of the thread is really explanation enough.
So no one got beaten by youths on a trail? I don't get your logic.
Are you slow or just willfully dense? OP is basically intimating with his/her title that people claim DC is great but hey! look! You can get beaten on a trail! As if this happens every day, which it doesn't. Whatever. All you pearl clutchers just hide in your suburban McMansions with guns trying not to pee your pants.![]()
Well the police have noted every other day reoccurring incidents on that trail. I don't think the local W&O trail has that issue so there is some type of problem in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why you so mad...
If OP stopped being an idiot, I'd stop presenting actual facts to dispute him/her.
Why is op an idiot. I don't get how what he/she posted is idiotic.
The title of the thread is really explanation enough.
So no one got beaten by youths on a trail? I don't get your logic.
Are you slow or just willfully dense? OP is basically intimating with his/her title that people claim DC is great but hey! look! You can get beaten on a trail! As if this happens every day, which it doesn't. Whatever. All you pearl clutchers just hide in your suburban McMansions with guns trying not to pee your pants.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why you so mad...
If OP stopped being an idiot, I'd stop presenting actual facts to dispute him/her.
Why is op an idiot. I don't get how what he/she posted is idiotic.
The title of the thread is really explanation enough.
So no one got beaten by youths on a trail? I don't get your logic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why you so mad...
If OP stopped being an idiot, I'd stop presenting actual facts to dispute him/her.
Why is op an idiot. I don't get how what he/she posted is idiotic.
The title of the thread is really explanation enough.
Anonymous wrote:Why can't criminals find another planet to live on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why you so mad...
If OP stopped being an idiot, I'd stop presenting actual facts to dispute him/her.
Why is op an idiot. I don't get how what he/she posted is idiotic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why you so mad...
If OP stopped being an idiot, I'd stop presenting actual facts to dispute him/her.
Anonymous wrote:why you so mad...