Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no point to open the City Center MS. Not enough kids to fill it.
Have you looked at the Seaton and Garrison feeder demographics under the new boundary proposals? Currently more than 500 ES-aged students in each catchment...and projected to go to over 700 in the next 4 years, but it's just that neither is good enough to retain them. Add in Thomson and the Cleveland English-track and you'd have ~200 students per grade if there were 60% participation. If you don't ever provide quality neighborhood elementaries, the middle school is an illusion.
And that's just the way a variety of lobbies (From developers to charters) like it.
Where are these kids going now? Cardozo?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no point to open the City Center MS. Not enough kids to fill it.
Have you looked at the Seaton and Garrison feeder demographics under the new boundary proposals? Currently more than 500 ES-aged students in each catchment...and projected to go to over 700 in the next 4 years, but it's just that neither is good enough to retain them. Add in Thomson and the Cleveland English-track and you'd have ~200 students per grade if there were 60% participation. If you don't ever provide quality neighborhood elementaries, the middle school is an illusion.
And that's just the way a variety of lobbies (From developers to charters) like it.
Anonymous wrote:There is no point to open the City Center MS. Not enough kids to fill it.
Anonymous wrote:I agree. Muriel hates mid-city. This area needs a new middle school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is supposed to be the new Center City Middle School, mentioned in the new boundaries process documents. There are about 4-5 elementary schools that will feed into it.
Funding was cut.
Bowser hates mid-city.
Anonymous wrote:Allegedly is is the site of a "planned" middle school, or is being held for office space, according to this http://dme.dc.gov/DC/DME/Publication%20Files/Surplus_Building_Inventory.pdf
I have heard that the renovations are supposed to begin in 2014, but I am not holding my breath. They closed Shaw and moved the kids to Garnet-Patterson. Now they're closing Garnet-Patterson for underenrollment and moving those kids to Cardozo.
Why DCPS would choose to renovate a school for 80 kids, I don't know. But then again, they spent something like $90 million on Cardozo for 240 students, so who knows what logic they use.
In the Shaw/U Street area, Meyer, Garnet-Patterson, Shaw, and Grimke will all be vacant next year (not clear on what is going on with Grimke - it's not on the list). It is pretty outrageous that not one of these properties is up for bid.