Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it odd. Like replacing something that clearly not be replaced.

Are you a parent?
If I lost 2 children, I would want to have another child. I don't think it's odd.

Yes, I am a parent. I could not imagine explaining to the child conceived out of tragedy that the only reason s/he exists is due to the deaths of other children. IMO it doesn't honor the memory of the dead. It's a bandaid for incredible pain and puts a child in a position, to be seen as 'replacement.'

This is totally common. My great-grandmother lost 9 children to illness, all within the span of a week. She had three more after that, and that is why I am here today.

Anonymous wrote:She is an attention whore.

And you are an idiot...she did not ask for her kids to be killed, and to be in the media...be happy for her and feel lucky this tragedy did not happen to you! Insensitive fool!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are an idiot to think that sex is only for happy people.

Who said that? Where?

You need to be told - who and where? You really need to know? Or you are just curious, sitting in front of you tablet with a glass of wine imagining WWYD in a place of Marina and her DH?

Anonymous wrote:What ever happened with that nanny? Was there a trial?

Not yet.

What ever happened with that nanny? Was there a trial?

Anonymous wrote:I find it odd. Like replacing something that clearly not be replaced.

Elizabeth and John Edwards had children after their first child died. Same with John Travolta and his wife.

Anonymous wrote:I find it odd. Like replacing something that clearly not be replaced.

Are you a parent?
If I lost 2 children, I would want to have another child. I don't think it's odd.

I find it odd. Like replacing something that clearly not be replaced.

She is an attention whore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very common for couples who have suffered the tragic loss of a child to try to get pregnant quickly in order to heal. I think you could say it is an important part of the quest for life for many couples. Good for them!

That cant be healthy. They should first deal with their emotions/ grief.

Maybe this would be true, ideally. However, advanced maternal/paternal age likely didn't make delaying future kids an option for them. I think I would do the same thing in their situation.

Anonymous wrote:You are an idiot to think that sex is only for happy people.

Who said that? Where?

Anonymous wrote:It is very common for couples who have suffered the tragic loss of a child to try to get pregnant quickly in order to heal. I think you could say it is an important part of the quest for life for many couples. Good for them!

That cant be healthy. They should first deal with their emotions/ grief.

It is very common for couples who have suffered the tragic loss of a child to try to get pregnant quickly in order to heal. I think you could say it is an important part of the quest for life for many couples. Good for them!

You are an idiot to think that sex is only for happy people.