Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think some allergies -- peanuts, strawberries, shellfish -- are real. The rest are just sensitivities that kids would grow out of a lot faster if they were exposed to the food more.
My best friend growing up was allergic to shellfish, but LOVED shrimp. She just put up with the mild itching until it eventually went away.
Your body can only adjust to something if it has a reason to.
I've heard about this in reverse with adults who choose to go gluten-free (I am not talking about diagnosed celiacs here - that's a whole different story). Their bodies stop getting used to processing gluten, so if they try gluten again they feel much worse. It's not that they were allergic in the first place, it's that their digestive system became unused to gluten.
Anonymous wrote:OP here thanks for all the great responses! I will say that as an ex cross fitter the Paleo diet basically made me have zero tolerance for gluten but I do realize that wasn't an allergy.
Anonymous wrote:And we have zero intolerance for even minor discomfort. I know a tiny minority of people are truly allergic, but the other 98% are just sensitive and would probably get better given the chance to adapt.
Anonymous wrote:some people believe the genetic modification of some foods, particularly grains have made people more intolerent. FOr that reason I do try to by GMO free when I can.
They do breed new grains to be pest resistant etc. I for one was pretty allergic to certain foods as a child that gave me rashes (more on the citrus and milk side).
My Dad (60s) had an egg allergy as a kid so it did exist. Growing up in the 1980s we ate plenty of processed food like orange cheeseballs and kids were not overweight nor as allergic to crazy things. Not sure....
So I think some of it may be changes in our food supply and the rest is just more awareness. People are more hyperfocused on their kids and get them tested and read more. We didn't even have the internet when I was kid.....
I avoid processed food by the big American companies as I do think the quality is poor these days with lots of fillers and who knows what else.
Anonymous wrote:Mom with three allergic kids. I bet my money on the vaccine, which are made with allergens (eggs, nuts, milk, soy, corn, etc). My husband and I are not allergic at all, the different between us and our kids are the vaccines they are exposed to since day 1. This explains the world wide rising in allergies since from US to China, every baby is now injected with much more allergens then we were in the old days. I am not saying that vaccine definitely causes allergies. But for certain babies, allergens in vaccine may just be enough to trigger the allergies in them.
Anonymous wrote:
My very own anecdotal study...
I grew up in South America and did not even know peanut allergies existed until I moved to the US for graduate school. Same for gluten. I had a friend who was allergic to shellfish and a cousin with a very severe allergy to penicillin, but that was it.
I always figured that maybe I was just not paying attention, but now that I have children of my own I do pay attention and when we go visit we do summer camp and attend many birthday parties plus all my friends have kids and I have only heard of one child with lactose intolerance. Not once have I been told to restrict certain foods when I send in lunch.
I am not saying they don't exist, but allergies just don't seem as prevalent there.
BTW, I work with children and I am now fully trained to use an epipen because many of the children I work with have very severe allergies. So I am not making light of the issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think some allergies -- peanuts, strawberries, shellfish -- are real. The rest are just sensitivities that kids would grow out of a lot faster if they were exposed to the food more.
My best friend growing up was allergic to shellfish, but LOVED shrimp. She just put up with the mild itching until it eventually went away.
Your body can only adjust to something if it has a reason to.
Deadly, dangerous anecdote recounted above. No one should ever try to "get your body to adjust to something if it has a reason to" unless this "adjustment" is done in a clinical study with epinepherine at the ready. Food challenges are done in a doctor's office over a period of months and even then, the doses of the allergenic patient are carefully measured and increased.
I speak as a mom with two nut allergic children and as a person who has a lifelong, anaphylactic reaction to fish. Oddly, I am not allergic to shellfish, but I avoid it because I was told that the odds are against me that I could suddenly develop an allergy to shellfish. Usually, the allergic reactions are progressive. What begins as "just" itchy lips could progress during the next exposure/ingestion to "just" wheezing, vomiting and throat swelling...in other words, anaphylactic shock/death.
Also, if I could climb atop this soapbox for a second (uhhhhh)...we ALL need to make a distinction between "food sensitivity" and "allergic". Not the same. Just as a migraine is NOT a synonym for a bad headache, (food) allergy is not an all-encompassing word that means "dislike" or "sometimes gives me gas." Seriously, I've heard my own contemporaries describe their own "allergies" this way. Not the same thing.
Not to get into a pissing contest here, but I've also gotten the other extreme; a mom will ask "just how allergic my DC are." As in, what happens? And, what was the RAST test #? Oh, not allergic to aerated peanut dust? Not as severe as Larla's allergies, etc.
Thanks. I feel better now.