Anonymous wrote:OP, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt as you were just hit with the news. Please DON'T call the stillborn baby "fetus", especially not within earshot of your grieving friend. It's a loaded term that minimizes the loss of parents with babies born still.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is exceedingly rare and horrible.
Not so exceedingly rare. The article above said Holy Cross alone has 150+ stillbirths a year. That's nearly one every other day.
The article is so true. We hear SOuch about trisomy risks and SIDS risks, which are both SO much more rare than stillbirth. More research is desperately needed.
What is your point? Honestly. This is the expectant moms board. Are you trying to worry mothers who are so desperately hoping their babies are ok? Not to mention skewing the stats - the article says 125-150. And the definition includes losses after 20 weeks.
Are you pregnant?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It happens. The risk of stillbirth (a loss after 20 weeks) is 1/160. Not to freak you out but it is a reality. There was a Washington post article on it a few years back http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/06/AR2009070602918.html
No one, including doctors, talk about it or the risks, because most of the time there is little you can do to prevent it. I've know people who have lost babies at 21weeks, 30 weeks and 40 weeks. Sad but reality.
This. My sister (who just delivered a heathy baby) lost her last baby at 28 wks. Her amnio was clear and the autopsy results were inconclusive. Her support group was full of women with stillborns. It is horrible but it happens. My midwife practice has patients sign a note saying they understand that late loss happens, often with no forewarning and for unknown reasons. That said, the majority of pregancies have happy endings but there is no point in hiding your head in the sand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It happens. The risk of stillbirth (a loss after 20 weeks) is 1/160. Not to freak you out but it is a reality. There was a Washington post article on it a few years back http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/06/AR2009070602918.html
No one, including doctors, talk about it or the risks, because most of the time there is little you can do to prevent it. I've know people who have lost babies at 21weeks, 30 weeks and 40 weeks. Sad but reality.
This. My sister (who just delivered a heathy baby) lost her last baby at 28 wks. Her amnio was clear and the autopsy results were inconclusive. Her support group was full of women with stillborns. It is horrible but it happens. My midwife practice has patients sign a note saying they understand that late loss happens, often with no forewarning and for unknown reasons. That said, the majority of pregancies have happy endings but there is no point in hiding your head in the sand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It happens. The risk of stillbirth (a loss after 20 weeks) is 1/160. Not to freak you out but it is a reality. There was a Washington post article on it a few years back http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/06/AR2009070602918.html
No one, including doctors, talk about it or the risks, because most of the time there is little you can do to prevent it. I've know people who have lost babies at 21weeks, 30 weeks and 40 weeks. Sad but reality.
This. My sister (who just delivered a heathy baby) lost her last baby at 28 wks. Her amnio was clear and the autopsy results were inconclusive. Her support group was full of women with stillborns. It is horrible but it happens. My midwife practice has patients sign a note saying they understand that late loss happens, often with no forewarning and for unknown reasons. That said, the majority of pregancies have happy endings but there is no point in hiding your head in the sand.
Anonymous wrote:It happens. The risk of stillbirth (a loss after 20 weeks) is 1/160. Not to freak you out but it is a reality. There was a Washington post article on it a few years back http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/06/AR2009070602918.html
No one, including doctors, talk about it or the risks, because most of the time there is little you can do to prevent it. I've know people who have lost babies at 21weeks, 30 weeks and 40 weeks. Sad but reality.
Anonymous wrote:PP again. I also have to say that the article above eventually ended up making me feel ANGRY. The man who wrote it was grieving, personally. He was saying that he and his wife would have benefitted so much from knowing exactly what his risks were. Well, now I know it's one more thing OUT OF MY CONTROL to worry and obsess about, and I wish I could put that genie back in the bottle. Yes, I want doctors to be paying attention to this, and researching the hell out of it, but I don't want this overdose of info. I don't want to worry about every disorder that could befall my fetus. I just don't want to hear it. Information is not power to everyone. To some of us, all this info can be debilitating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is exceedingly rare and horrible.
Not so exceedingly rare. The article above said Holy Cross alone has 150+ stillbirths a year. That's nearly one every other day.
The article is so true. We hear SOuch about trisomy risks and SIDS risks, which are both SO much more rare than stillbirth. More research is desperately needed.