Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, because I live in the city and chain restaurants are not a default option for me. But I don't think I would eat there in any case. So not an appealing choice for many reasons.
OK, living in the city or not has nothing to do with patronizing chains![]()
![]()
It does. There are just so many choices in DC proper that are not chains, and many chains don't even come into the District. When you don't have a car, it's not really an option to cruise Rockville Pike to pick which chain you will eat at that night.
Point missed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, because I live in the city and chain restaurants are not a default option for me. But I don't think I would eat there in any case. So not an appealing choice for many reasons.
OK, living in the city or not has nothing to do with patronizing chains![]()
![]()
It does. There are just so many choices in DC proper that are not chains, and many chains don't even come into the District. When you don't have a car, it's not really an option to cruise Rockville Pike to pick which chain you will eat at that night.
Anonymous wrote:There should be a place called Dicks or something and hire men like John Hamm in tight and skimpy clothing.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, because I live in the city and chain restaurants are not a default option for me. But I don't think I would eat there in any case. So not an appealing choice for many reasons.
OK, living in the city or not has nothing to do with patronizing chains![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:No, because I live in the city and chain restaurants are not a default option for me. But I don't think I would eat there in any case. So not an appealing choice for many reasons.