Anonymous wrote:If you don't have the budget to renovate, I would disagree with PPs and get a house I love on the inside that isn't amazing on the outside. You'll be living it in! And let's be honest, in a lot of neighborhoods, if your budget is any way limited, you're not getting a beauty on the outside. You may as well enjoy the inside, which is where you'll spend most of your time.
I never thought I would buy a split-level, but we just found one with a very open floor plan in a great school district close-in, and we put a contract down. Love love the inside; I will learn to deal with the outside.
Anonymous wrote:I'm okay with ugly interior (that can be changed) but not an ugly shell. For instance, I'd never buy a rambler or a split level (hate those styles) but even a totally dated colonial or Cape Cod would be fine b/c I'd have hope of one day fixing it into something I liked.
Anonymous wrote:It's funny the lengths humans go into fooling themselves into rationalizing a decision. No where else is the phenomenon more prevalent than the DC area where old homes are too expensive to tear down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love, love, love my homely house. When we bought it, it had that horrible Baltimore-style fake stone on the front. Still does. It also had metal awnings. The walls inside were layered with wallpaper and the floors with carpet on top of vinyl.
Since then, we ripped up the flooring and found pristine hardwoods. We slowly removed all the paper and painted. And we are finally redoing the kitchen. The outside is still funny-looking but it's definitely growing on me, especially because we never could have bought the house if it didn't look so bad to begin with.
We have space enough for 4, a full basement, and get to live in a great neighborhood. Thank goodness for ugly!
Are you in Baltimore? I am, and i know the fake stone you're talking about!
No, Capitol Hill. We have it here, too. But I noticed it really took hold in some parts of Baltimore.No offense meant--I love Baltimore rowhouses!
no offense taken. I just thought it was funny that I knew exactly what you're talking about!
Anonymous wrote:I'm okay with ugly interior (that can be changed) but not an ugly shell. For instance, I'd never buy a rambler or a split level (hate those styles) but even a totally dated colonial or Cape Cod would be fine b/c I'd have hope of one day fixing it into smething I liked.
Anonymous wrote:It's funny the lengths humans go into fooling themselves into rationalizing a decision. No where else is the phenomenon more prevalent than the DC area where old homes are too expensive to tear down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's funny the lengths humans go into fooling themselves into rationalizing a decision. No where else is the phenomenon more prevalent than the DC area where old homes are too expensive to tear down.
So what do you suggest instead, given a limited budget and looking for a decent commute and good schools? We're looking at the Silver Spring area for under $400,000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love, love, love my homely house. When we bought it, it had that horrible Baltimore-style fake stone on the front. Still does. It also had metal awnings. The walls inside were layered with wallpaper and the floors with carpet on top of vinyl.
Since then, we ripped up the flooring and found pristine hardwoods. We slowly removed all the paper and painted. And we are finally redoing the kitchen. The outside is still funny-looking but it's definitely growing on me, especially because we never could have bought the house if it didn't look so bad to begin with.
We have space enough for 4, a full basement, and get to live in a great neighborhood. Thank goodness for ugly!
Are you in Baltimore? I am, and i know the fake stone you're talking about!
No, Capitol Hill. We have it here, too. But I noticed it really took hold in some parts of Baltimore.No offense meant--I love Baltimore rowhouses!
no offense taken. I just thought it was funny that I knew exactly what you're talking about!
Can someone post a link please? I'm having a hard time imagining this.
Anonymous wrote:It's funny the lengths humans go into fooling themselves into rationalizing a decision. No where else is the phenomenon more prevalent than the DC area where old homes are too expensive to tear down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love, love, love my homely house. When we bought it, it had that horrible Baltimore-style fake stone on the front. Still does. It also had metal awnings. The walls inside were layered with wallpaper and the floors with carpet on top of vinyl.
Since then, we ripped up the flooring and found pristine hardwoods. We slowly removed all the paper and painted. And we are finally redoing the kitchen. The outside is still funny-looking but it's definitely growing on me, especially because we never could have bought the house if it didn't look so bad to begin with.
We have space enough for 4, a full basement, and get to live in a great neighborhood. Thank goodness for ugly!
Are you in Baltimore? I am, and i know the fake stone you're talking about!
No, Capitol Hill. We have it here, too. But I noticed it really took hold in some parts of Baltimore.No offense meant--I love Baltimore rowhouses!
no offense taken. I just thought it was funny that I knew exactly what you're talking about!