Anonymous wrote:Being direct and truthful is not an issue. You have to do that, out of respect for them.
- So I would start off by saying that you see how they love being with their grandchildren, and that you want to facilitate this as much as possible.
- That you love them both dearly and that you know this will be upsetting for them to hear. That you are sorry for this.
- But that recently DH and yourself have been worried by eyesight/reaction time/whatever it is while driving. Make sure to include for both of them a specific incident, to prove your point!
- Add that of course you can see they still have all their intellect, which is why you feel you can all have a very calm and rational discussion about this.
- Finally, say that DH and yourself have come to the conclusion that the children will now be driven by yourselves. Suggest new routine of sleepovers here.
If they can see that you care for their well-being and sincerely want their relationship with their grandchildren to continue, then it will greatly ease the pain.
I feel like I have a handle on how the second half of the conversation would go (logistics, me offering to drop kids off, etc.) but I'm so afraid of simply starting the conversation. This is the start of something way bigger. It breaks my heart. They live in a huge house further out. They come into Chevy Chase, Bethesda, DC, all the time for doc appointments. How far away are we from telling them they shouldn't be driving at all? Is this conversation the precursor to the "sell your house and get a condo in Chevy Chase next to the Barlow Bldg where all your various doc appointments are"?
Anonymous wrote:How do I even begin this conversation with my inlaws? My hands shake just thinking about it.
They are in their late 70s. MIL and FIL are equally bad in their own ways. Kids are 1 and 3. We see them 1-3 times a week. They take our oldest either on little outings or for sleepovers about 1x/week. This will be a HUGE change. They don't work and their grandchildren are their entire lives.
For a number of reasons, the conversation will have to involve me, if not come solely from me. I have a great relationship with them and feel just as close as if they were blood to me. However, MIL cand be "difficult" and I'm at a loss how to approach this.
I have concerns about their ability to competently care for my kids and this is the tip of the iceberg but its the first step.
This will be the first "aging/competence" discussion anyone has ever had with either of them about anything.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks everyone. I know it might sound odd, but I do have a good relationship with my inlaws. I'm more rational and level headed than DH (not saying much) and my delivery would probably be more effective. Also, I'm a SAHM and definitely more connected with the kids and their routines, including their routines with the inlaws. It would be very obvious that this would be coming from me, regardless of who the messenger was. I feel like I owe it to them to have the conversation face to face with them and not use DH as a straw man. For example, DH hasn't been around for some of the concerning incidents and it would be obvious that he would be bringing up concerns on my behalf.
I feel like I have a handle on how the second half of the conversation would go (logistics, me offering to drop kids off, etc.) but I'm so afraid of simply starting the conversation. This is the start of something way bigger. It breaks my heart. They live in a huge house further out. They come into Chevy Chase, Bethesda, DC, all the time for doc appointments. How far away are we from telling them they shouldn't be driving at all? Is this conversation the precursor to the "sell your house and get a condo in Chevy Chase next to the Barlow Bldg where all your various doc appointments are"?
I know my childrens' safety comes before all else. But my sympathy and guilt and confrontation-avoidance is a close second.
Anonymous wrote:No matter how you approach this, they are going to be upset, so I think going in with low expectations is key.
I think it needs to be both you and DH, so there are no questions about how they react or what they say, and you can make sure everything is clear.
Be direct: "We're no longer comfortable with you driving Larla and Aiden. We still want you to see them as much as possible, and we're willing to make that happen, though that may change a bit."
When they pushback on why: "There have been a few incidents. We're just not comfortable with it anymore." Keep repeating that basic line. Don't get into it more than that or you'll spend the whole conversation with them picking apart your reasoning.When they pushback on scheduling: Have some specific ideas about how things they do now can still be done or done with some modifications.
If they completely blow up and say you can't tell them what to do, they're just fine, etc...realize you may have to back off on one-on-one visits for awhile if you don't trust that they still won't drive your kids while the kids are there, just to show you.
Anonymous wrote:DH needs to be INCLUDED is this conversation - but you need to be there as well to support all of them. These are his parents and I guarantee that it is 10x as difficult for him as it is for you. Asking him to do this by himself would be unfair and cruel. And I say this to all the "Let the DH handle it" posters.
In our case, we were direct and we also did not make it JUST about the kids. After all, we care about the GP's safety too. "Mom and Dad, we are concerned about your safety. We noticed X the last time you drove and we realize that the drive to our place is tough (a lot of winding roads, hills, etc.). From now on, we will just bring DC's to you." My FIL took it in stride, my MIL cried like a baby and my DH was heartbroken. But once the routine kicked in, they realized that they were not missing any time and that it was easier on them.
GL