Anonymous wrote:UPDATE
New memo from the LSAT (scroll down) http://oysteradamsbilingual.org/lsat/
A lot of time and effort went in to engaging current families to raise some issues and look for potential ideas in a constructive and respectful manner. It's not a perfect process and the memo isn't meant to be the last word. Nobody knows what happens next. DCPS looks to be kicking the boundary can down the road.
I'm a current IB bilingual parent with no set opinion on the future. This memo has information on past and current challenges I wasn't aware of. (I think of myself as "involved" at school.) I am very thankful to the parents and staff who worked so hard on this.
Whether you're a booster, basher, or just curious about Oyster-Adams, it makes for interesting reading.
For you data hounds out there, enjoy chewing over the raw numbers of the surveys.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I attended the Kalorama/Woodley Park neighborhood assoc. meeting last night at Oyster. The principal addressed this rumor directly. She said that while she would personally like the school to move so that it could be housed in one building (for her own convenience), she acknowledged the probability of Oyster moving was close to zero. She is correct, Woodley Park residents would allow Oyster (the only public bilingual school in Ward 3) to be snatched out of that neighborhood when hell freezes.
I was there too. Yes, it was nice to hear Monica acknowledge the obvious. Not only because most current parents (both in and out boundary) would oppose a move, but because moving the school elsewhere would jeopardize the success of one of the most diverse and high functioning schools in the whole district. I understand that the principal and the advisory group are considering more reasonable options, such as how to increase capacity at the Adams campus.
The most interesting question is, why doesn't DCPS prepare a plan to help other schools who may want to do so to replicate the Oyster model? We could have Oyster West, East, North and South![]()
Does anyone know how the Tools of the Mind roll-out is going?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I attended the Kalorama/Woodley Park neighborhood assoc. meeting last night at Oyster. The principal addressed this rumor directly. She said that while she would personally like the school to move so that it could be housed in one building (for her own convenience), she acknowledged the probability of Oyster moving was close to zero. She is correct, Woodley Park residents would allow Oyster (the only public bilingual school in Ward 3) to be snatched out of that neighborhood when hell freezes.
I was there too. Yes, it was nice to hear Monica acknowledge the obvious. Not only because most current parents (both in and out boundary) would oppose a move, but because moving the school elsewhere would jeopardize the success of one of the most diverse and high functioning schools in the whole district. I understand that the principal and the advisory group are considering more reasonable options, such as how to increase capacity at the Adams campus.
Anonymous wrote:I attended the Kalorama/Woodley Park neighborhood assoc. meeting last night at Oyster. The principal addressed this rumor directly. She said that while she would personally like the school to move so that it could be housed in one building (for her own convenience), she acknowledged the probability of Oyster moving was close to zero. She is correct, Woodley Park residents would allow Oyster (the only public bilingual school in Ward 3) to be snatched out of that neighborhood when hell freezes.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how a neighborhood school can just move out of the neighborhood. That makes no sense. Sure, it has the specialty program but it is also the inbounds-of-right school, no?
What if central decided one year that it was time for Janney to move to Potomac avenue? Do the kids of AU park then need to commute to Potomac ave thereafter? Is a school called janney but not filled 100% with AU park kids really still "Janney"?