Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:God, PP - you know, I was not blase, so fuck you. I simply outlined what I would have HAD to do. B/C I am not so hoity-toity that I can afford to live in the neighborhoods with the best schools and I will not rent a place the size of a shoebox to be zoned there. My DH and I would have faced tough choices - stay where we are and forego or delay a second child, move and deal with a shitty commute to work in the city, or move out of the area altogether. Look - I GET THE FRUSTRATION. But I don't really get the point of this thread. We all know there are not enough good schools. Was this somehow NEWS for OP and others like you?
As you can see from the post right before your totally rude "F-U" post, I get it now, I read your post and I understand now that you weren't blase.
You know, it's the internet, an anonymous message board. Sometimes it's not obvious from someone's post where they're coming from, but you should really drink some tea or take a walk if you are going to get that hot and cursing because people can't tell from your tone that this isn't an easy choice for you. Because, remember, this is DCUM: this IS an easy choice for many here, and there are examples daily on this and other DCUM forums where people take these choices for granted. I went to one lottery and heard a woman say of her older kids (so she's not paying just daycare costs) oh well, I guess I'll keep them in private then. I had hoped for this because it would be great to free up these funds, but their current school is great so we'll just stay there."
Chill out. We get where you're coming from now. No need to flip us all off.
10:55, my post wasn't directed toward you. It was in response to 10:33, you just beat me to posting. So YOU chill out. I was addressing all of the jerks that came before you to pile on. I'm not trying to free up funds to take fancier vacations, and I doubt most others are either. To assume that is just asinine.
Um, since I'm the only one who used the word "blase" in a post, how were you not talking to me? And I'm going to leave it alone after this, but seriously, you aren't even reading clearly now. I just said that I get that YOU aren't freeing up funds for vacations, my point (which I couldn't have said anymore clearly) is that there are MANY here who ARE just as easily going private or doing charters, it's clear from the posts here and on other forums. NO ONE IS ASSUMING YOU HAVE TONS OF FUNDS PP.
But from experience, your way over the top defensiveness is much bigger than this thread, so I'll just leave it at that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, somebody gets in, because there are tons of people with kids in charter schools, including me. I understand your frustration, and yes, the odds are low but just like the Powerball somebody's number is going to come up. It just sucks when it isn't yours. The fact that lots of people don't get in doesn't mean that charters are a waste of time. We all play the hand we're dealt. If I hadn't gotten a slot, we simply would have left our child in daycare until K and then enrolled him at a Catholic school.
Yeah! 2 extra years of daycare - because you know, everyone can just pay for that.
Maybe you should consider moving to Alexandria, Arlington, fairfax, PG or Montgomery. Oh, that's right, they don,t offer PS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, somebody gets in, because there are tons of people with kids in charter schools, including me. I understand your frustration, and yes, the odds are low but just like the Powerball somebody's number is going to come up. It just sucks when it isn't yours. The fact that lots of people don't get in doesn't mean that charters are a waste of time. We all play the hand we're dealt. If I hadn't gotten a slot, we simply would have left our child in daycare until K and then enrolled him at a Catholic school.
Yeah! 2 extra years of daycare - because you know, everyone can just pay for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:God, PP - you know, I was not blase, so fuck you. I simply outlined what I would have HAD to do. B/C I am not so hoity-toity that I can afford to live in the neighborhoods with the best schools and I will not rent a place the size of a shoebox to be zoned there. My DH and I would have faced tough choices - stay where we are and forego or delay a second child, move and deal with a shitty commute to work in the city, or move out of the area altogether. Look - I GET THE FRUSTRATION. But I don't really get the point of this thread. We all know there are not enough good schools. Was this somehow NEWS for OP and others like you?
As you can see from the post right before your totally rude "F-U" post, I get it now, I read your post and I understand now that you weren't blase.
You know, it's the internet, an anonymous message board. Sometimes it's not obvious from someone's post where they're coming from, but you should really drink some tea or take a walk if you are going to get that hot and cursing because people can't tell from your tone that this isn't an easy choice for you. Because, remember, this is DCUM: this IS an easy choice for many here, and there are examples daily on this and other DCUM forums where people take these choices for granted. I went to one lottery and heard a woman say of her older kids (so she's not paying just daycare costs) oh well, I guess I'll keep them in private then. I had hoped for this because it would be great to free up these funds, but their current school is great so we'll just stay there."
Chill out. We get where you're coming from now. No need to flip us all off.
10:55, my post wasn't directed toward you. It was in response to 10:33, you just beat me to posting. So YOU chill out. I was addressing all of the jerks that came before you to pile on. I'm not trying to free up funds to take fancier vacations, and I doubt most others are either. To assume that is just asinine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:God, PP - you know, I was not blase, so fuck you. I simply outlined what I would have HAD to do. B/C I am not so hoity-toity that I can afford to live in the neighborhoods with the best schools and I will not rent a place the size of a shoebox to be zoned there. My DH and I would have faced tough choices - stay where we are and forego or delay a second child, move and deal with a shitty commute to work in the city, or move out of the area altogether. Look - I GET THE FRUSTRATION. But I don't really get the point of this thread. We all know there are not enough good schools. Was this somehow NEWS for OP and others like you?
As you can see from the post right before your totally rude "F-U" post, I get it now, I read your post and I understand now that you weren't blase.
You know, it's the internet, an anonymous message board. Sometimes it's not obvious from someone's post where they're coming from, but you should really drink some tea or take a walk if you are going to get that hot and cursing because people can't tell from your tone that this isn't an easy choice for you. Because, remember, this is DCUM: this IS an easy choice for many here, and there are examples daily on this and other DCUM forums where people take these choices for granted. I went to one lottery and heard a woman say of her older kids (so she's not paying just daycare costs) oh well, I guess I'll keep them in private then. I had hoped for this because it would be great to free up these funds, but their current school is great so we'll just stay there."
Chill out. We get where you're coming from now. No need to flip us all off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, somebody gets in, because there are tons of people with kids in charter schools, including me. I understand your frustration, and yes, the odds are low but just like the Powerball somebody's number is going to come up. It just sucks when it isn't yours. The fact that lots of people don't get in doesn't mean that charters are a waste of time. We all play the hand we're dealt. If I hadn't gotten a slot, we simply would have left our child in daycare until K and then enrolled him at a Catholic school.
Yeah! 2 extra years of daycare - because you know, everyone can just pay for that.
Universal PS and PK (all day) are fairly new. You can get into a PS or PK, there were plenty of spots open last year and there will be this year, just not a school you may consider worthy. Did you plan for your kid? If so, did you only plan for 3 years of daycare?
Anonymous wrote:God, PP - you know, I was not blase, so fuck you. I simply outlined what I would have HAD to do. B/C I am not so hoity-toity that I can afford to live in the neighborhoods with the best schools and I will not rent a place the size of a shoebox to be zoned there. My DH and I would have faced tough choices - stay where we are and forego or delay a second child, move and deal with a shitty commute to work in the city, or move out of the area altogether. Look - I GET THE FRUSTRATION. But I don't really get the point of this thread. We all know there are not enough good schools. Was this somehow NEWS for OP and others like you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, somebody gets in, because there are tons of people with kids in charter schools, including me. I understand your frustration, and yes, the odds are low but just like the Powerball somebody's number is going to come up. It just sucks when it isn't yours. The fact that lots of people don't get in doesn't mean that charters are a waste of time. We all play the hand we're dealt. If I hadn't gotten a slot, we simply would have left our child in daycare until K and then enrolled him at a Catholic school.
Yeah! 2 extra years of daycare - because you know, everyone can just pay for that.
Why? The point is not that there is something wrong with charters/school choice. The point is that there aren't enough charters to go around and we need more of them for true choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, somebody gets in, because there are tons of people with kids in charter schools, including me. I understand your frustration, and yes, the odds are low but just like the Powerball somebody's number is going to come up. It just sucks when it isn't yours. The fact that lots of people don't get in doesn't mean that charters are a waste of time. We all play the hand we're dealt. If I hadn't gotten a slot, we simply would have left our child in daycare until K and then enrolled him at a Catholic school.
Yeah! 2 extra years of daycare - because you know, everyone can just pay for that.
Again, JERK - it would have meant putting off having a second child. I can't "just pay for that" either. I'd have to make choices and stay on BC. But thanks for pretending you know everything about my situation when you don't. My point is that everyone has to make tough choices. No one is guaranteed a spot for free PS3/PK4 and no one should act as though they are entitled to it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, somebody gets in, because there are tons of people with kids in charter schools, including me. I understand your frustration, and yes, the odds are low but just like the Powerball somebody's number is going to come up. It just sucks when it isn't yours. The fact that lots of people don't get in doesn't mean that charters are a waste of time. We all play the hand we're dealt. If I hadn't gotten a slot, we simply would have left our child in daycare until K and then enrolled him at a Catholic school.
Yeah! 2 extra years of daycare - because you know, everyone can just pay for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, somebody gets in, because there are tons of people with kids in charter schools, including me. I understand your frustration, and yes, the odds are low but just like the Powerball somebody's number is going to come up. It just sucks when it isn't yours. The fact that lots of people don't get in doesn't mean that charters are a waste of time. We all play the hand we're dealt. If I hadn't gotten a slot, we simply would have left our child in daycare until K and then enrolled him at a Catholic school.
Yeah! 2 extra years of daycare - because you know, everyone can just pay for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, somebody gets in, because there are tons of people with kids in charter schools, including me. I understand your frustration, and yes, the odds are low but just like the Powerball somebody's number is going to come up. It just sucks when it isn't yours. The fact that lots of people don't get in doesn't mean that charters are a waste of time. We all play the hand we're dealt. If I hadn't gotten a slot, we simply would have left our child in daycare until K and then enrolled him at a Catholic school.
Well, great that you can pay for school. Not everyone can do that.