Anonymous wrote:OP here. To all those posters who were once religious but are no longer believing, on your death bed, do you think you will make peace with god ? or will you stand firm in your current beliefs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For those who believe - do you feel other religions are "wrong" or those individuals won't go to heaven? That is one of my problems with believing whole heartedly in Christianity.
The quote below is from paragraph 847 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
"847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:
Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.337"
Do I feel other religions are wrong? My answer (yes) may seem judgemental in a way I do not mean at all. If I thought another religion, or another Christian denomination was more "right", then I would follow that denomination. I am a catholic because I believe catholicism, with its faults, is still the closest thing we have to the Church founded by Jesus when he commissioned Peter and the other apostles to go out into the world. Do I think Lutherans, or Baptists won't go to heaven...no I don't think that (my wife is Presbyterian and I am confident of her salvation).
Personally, I am more judgemental about cafeteria catholics than I am about people from other faith traditions. I'm not proud of that, but it is true. My thought is that one who is religious should be committed. I think that if you are a Lutheran, be a really good Lutheran...etc.
Anonymous wrote:For those who believe - do you feel other religions are "wrong" or those individuals won't go to heaven? That is one of my problems with believing whole heartedly in Christianity.
Anonymous wrote:For those who believe - do you feel other religions are "wrong" or those individuals won't go to heaven? That is one of my problems with believing whole heartedly in Christianity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was raised protestant christian and as I've gotten older I have grown more skeptical. I am now a parent and we do attend church (a very progressive congregation but not UU). I don't tell my daughter anything is "fact" (for example heaven). I just tell her that Jesus was a teacher and that we don't exactly know what happens when you die. She has not yet been baptized because I don't know how I feel about that. I think I may let her decide when she is older.
Regarding what I put in bold. I remember reading something from CS Lewis years ago on this topic. Lewis would forcefully refute what you've said about Jesus being just a teacher. He said something to the effect that it was not possible for Jesus to have been "merely a good and wise religious philosopher" (I'm quoting for emphasis, not becuase those are Lewis' exact words). Lewis reasoned that if Jesus was merely a good and wise teacher then it would have been truly evil for him to have allowed the many thousands of people who were his followers (during his own earthly lifetime) to have believed that he was the messiah, the son of God. That reasoning resonated with me. It is one of multiple reasons why I personally believe in the divinity of Jesus.
Much of this stuff is just "faith" and you have to have some of that to believe. We can't scientifically, or historically prove much of what is in the scriptures, but for people like me, there is enough there to get me that kernel of faith from which I am able to believe the things that are not scientifically provable. I believe much of the old testament is not to be taken literally. I believe the new testament is factually correct in describing the life of Jesus and the early church afterward.
Great topic.
Former Christian here. Maybe Jesus believed it himself? Good and wise people can be wrong about things, too.
Good point. I am 15:28. I think I approach my faith with a very signficant amount of logic. There are many reasons why I believe (and specifically why I believe in the divinity of Jesus, which is a pretty wild idea if you think about it in isolation). If you believe in the bible, and that is one of the big keys...then Jesus performed many many miracles in front of both small and very large crowds of people. Those miracles are recorded in the Gospels. The Gospels were written roughly between 20 and 50 years after Jesus died. Lots of people saw those miracles. Paul the Apostle wrote of some of them in his epistles as well. It seems logical to me that if Jesus really didn't do those miracles, then people would have confronted the early Church leaders by calling bull on this. If that is the case, I am not aware of it. So I conclude (mostly because of logic, but I admit also based in part on faith) that Jesus really did do those miracles, including raising Lazarus from the dead. That particular miracle story is, to me, the most blatant display of supernatural power attributed to Jesus. Moreover, he performed that miracle in front of an entire village of people. Additionally, he intentionally waited a couple of days before doing this, just so this particular miracle would be more impactful to those witnessing it. It is an awesome story (if you believe it).
Also, every one of the 12 Apostles, with the exception of John the Beloved, was Martyred. Logically, (not based on faith, but on logic) I find it somewhat difficult to beleive that these men who were closest to Jesus, would go to their deaths professing something that they knew to be a lie. I know your entire point is that Jesus and those close to him may have actually believed it themselves, but I make this point for any who might think they were just making the whole thing up. This goes to my original point that it would actually be an act of evil to intentionally decieve people about Jesus. Because I agree with CS Lewis, I find it illogical to conclude that Jesus was a "good person" but was not divine. My faith makes this easy, but logic points me in the same direction.
Please don't take this as me proselytizing to you or arguing with you. Hopefully it is an interesting discussion and not a disagreement or an argument.
Not sure "I believe Jesus was the son of God because I believe in the Bible" is particularly "logical".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was raised protestant christian and as I've gotten older I have grown more skeptical. I am now a parent and we do attend church (a very progressive congregation but not UU). I don't tell my daughter anything is "fact" (for example heaven). I just tell her that Jesus was a teacher and that we don't exactly know what happens when you die. She has not yet been baptized because I don't know how I feel about that. I think I may let her decide when she is older.
Regarding what I put in bold. I remember reading something from CS Lewis years ago on this topic. Lewis would forcefully refute what you've said about Jesus being just a teacher. He said something to the effect that it was not possible for Jesus to have been "merely a good and wise religious philosopher" (I'm quoting for emphasis, not becuase those are Lewis' exact words). Lewis reasoned that if Jesus was merely a good and wise teacher then it would have been truly evil for him to have allowed the many thousands of people who were his followers (during his own earthly lifetime) to have believed that he was the messiah, the son of God. That reasoning resonated with me. It is one of multiple reasons why I personally believe in the divinity of Jesus.
Much of this stuff is just "faith" and you have to have some of that to believe. We can't scientifically, or historically prove much of what is in the scriptures, but for people like me, there is enough there to get me that kernel of faith from which I am able to believe the things that are not scientifically provable. I believe much of the old testament is not to be taken literally. I believe the new testament is factually correct in describing the life of Jesus and the early church afterward.
Great topic.
Former Christian here. Maybe Jesus believed it himself? Good and wise people can be wrong about things, too.
Good point. I am 15:28. I think I approach my faith with a very signficant amount of logic. There are many reasons why I believe (and specifically why I believe in the divinity of Jesus, which is a pretty wild idea if you think about it in isolation). If you believe in the bible, and that is one of the big keys...then Jesus performed many many miracles in front of both small and very large crowds of people. Those miracles are recorded in the Gospels. The Gospels were written roughly between 20 and 50 years after Jesus died. Lots of people saw those miracles. Paul the Apostle wrote of some of them in his epistles as well. It seems logical to me that if Jesus really didn't do those miracles, then people would have confronted the early Church leaders by calling bull on this. If that is the case, I am not aware of it. So I conclude (mostly because of logic, but I admit also based in part on faith) that Jesus really did do those miracles, including raising Lazarus from the dead. That particular miracle story is, to me, the most blatant display of supernatural power attributed to Jesus. Moreover, he performed that miracle in front of an entire village of people. Additionally, he intentionally waited a couple of days before doing this, just so this particular miracle would be more impactful to those witnessing it. It is an awesome story (if you believe it).
Also, every one of the 12 Apostles, with the exception of John the Beloved, was Martyred. Logically, (not based on faith, but on logic) I find it somewhat difficult to beleive that these men who were closest to Jesus, would go to their deaths professing something that they knew to be a lie. I know your entire point is that Jesus and those close to him may have actually believed it themselves, but I make this point for any who might think they were just making the whole thing up. This goes to my original point that it would actually be an act of evil to intentionally decieve people about Jesus. Because I agree with CS Lewis, I find it illogical to conclude that Jesus was a "good person" but was not divine. My faith makes this easy, but logic points me in the same direction.
Please don't take this as me proselytizing to you or arguing with you. Hopefully it is an interesting discussion and not a disagreement or an argument.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was raised protestant christian and as I've gotten older I have grown more skeptical. I am now a parent and we do attend church (a very progressive congregation but not UU). I don't tell my daughter anything is "fact" (for example heaven). I just tell her that Jesus was a teacher and that we don't exactly know what happens when you die. She has not yet been baptized because I don't know how I feel about that. I think I may let her decide when she is older.
Regarding what I put in bold. I remember reading something from CS Lewis years ago on this topic. Lewis would forcefully refute what you've said about Jesus being just a teacher. He said something to the effect that it was not possible for Jesus to have been "merely a good and wise religious philosopher" (I'm quoting for emphasis, not becuase those are Lewis' exact words). Lewis reasoned that if Jesus was merely a good and wise teacher then it would have been truly evil for him to have allowed the many thousands of people who were his followers (during his own earthly lifetime) to have believed that he was the messiah, the son of God. That reasoning resonated with me. It is one of multiple reasons why I personally believe in the divinity of Jesus.
Much of this stuff is just "faith" and you have to have some of that to believe. We can't scientifically, or historically prove much of what is in the scriptures, but for people like me, there is enough there to get me that kernel of faith from which I am able to believe the things that are not scientifically provable. I believe much of the old testament is not to be taken literally. I believe the new testament is factually correct in describing the life of Jesus and the early church afterward.
Great topic.
Former Christian here. Maybe Jesus believed it himself? Good and wise people can be wrong about things, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was raised protestant christian and as I've gotten older I have grown more skeptical. I am now a parent and we do attend church (a very progressive congregation but not UU). I don't tell my daughter anything is "fact" (for example heaven). I just tell her that Jesus was a teacher and that we don't exactly know what happens when you die. She has not yet been baptized because I don't know how I feel about that. I think I may let her decide when she is older.
I am a true believer. I am Catholic. I was an ignorant Christian until I began dating my wife, the daughter of a Presbyterian minister. In order to discuss religion with her, I had to educate myself on what my own denomination taught. In educating myself, I became a person that believed not just because I was raised in that denomination, but because the literature I read was powerfully moving, thought provoking and convincing to me.
Regarding what I put in bold. I remember reading something from CS Lewis years ago on this topic. Lewis would forcefully refute what you've said about Jesus being just a teacher. He said something to the effect that it was not possible for Jesus to have been "merely a good and wise religious philosopher" (I'm quoting for emphasis, not becuase those are Lewis' exact words). Lewis reasoned that if Jesus was merely a good and wise teacher then it would have been truly evil for him to have allowed the many thousands of people who were his followers (during his own earthly lifetime) to have believed that he was the messiah, the son of God. That reasoning resonated with me. It is one of multiple reasons why I personally believe in the divinity of Jesus.
Much of this stuff is just "faith" and you have to have some of that to believe. We can't scientifically, or historically prove much of what is in the scriptures, but for people like me, there is enough there to get me that kernel of faith from which I am able to believe the things that are not scientifically provable. I believe much of the old testament is not to be taken literally. I believe the new testament is factually correct in describing the life of Jesus and the early church afterward.
Great topic.