Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getbreal that's not what I said at all. I said I didn't care but everyone shouldn't be forced to have the same comfort level.
Everyone has the right to have their own comfort level. I can feel uncomfortable sitting next to a black person in a restaurant. i can even go to the owner and complain. But that owner CANNOT go to the black customer who is simply sitting there enjoying a meal and require him to leave because I feel uncomfortable.
So please propose how it should be determined whether to let someone stay or not. The woman in question was NOT engaged in any inappropriate behavior and was following the spa rules. She produced a drivers license indicating she was a female. Yet she made some other customers "uncomfortable" with her appearance. Please share what the determining factor(s) should be to require that person to leave.
Stop. Like it our not, this is still choice they're making. I respect that they made this difficult decision. But to compare this with AA who were judged not by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin is an insult.
This really isn't the civil rights issue of our time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getbreal that's not what I said at all. I said I didn't care but everyone shouldn't be forced to have the same comfort level.
Everyone has the right to have their own comfort level. I can feel uncomfortable sitting next to a black person in a restaurant. i can even go to the owner and complain. But that owner CANNOT go to the black customer who is simply sitting there enjoying a meal and require him to leave because I feel uncomfortable.
So please propose how it should be determined whether to let someone stay or not. The woman in question was NOT engaged in any inappropriate behavior and was following the spa rules. She produced a drivers license indicating she was a female. Yet she made some other customers "uncomfortable" with her appearance. Please share what the determining factor(s) should be to require that person to leave.
Anonymous wrote:Getbreal that's not what I said at all. I said I didn't care but everyone shouldn't be forced to have the same comfort level.
Anonymous wrote:we're not talking about diversity in public, we're talking about diversity in a room where people are naked. That's a completely different situation. If i'm naked I have a right to feel comfortable about who is seeing me that way. How do I know if that person is a tranny vs a perv pretending to be? Vulvas in one room, penis's in another please.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getbreal that's not what I said at all. I said I didn't care but everyone shouldn't be forced to have the same comfort level.
If a person is not comfortable with encountering diversity in public, then maybe that person shouldn't be out in public places.
we're not talking about diversity in public, we're talking about diversity in a room where people are naked. That's a completely different situation. If i'm naked I have a right to feel comfortable about who is seeing me that way. How do I know if that person is a tranny vs a perv pretending to be? Vulvas in one room, penis's in another please.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getbreal that's not what I said at all. I said I didn't care but everyone shouldn't be forced to have the same comfort level.
If a person is not comfortable with encountering diversity in public, then maybe that person shouldn't be out in public places.
Anonymous wrote:Pre or post op? It would bother me if there was a penis in the locker room, regardless of how that person identifies.
Anonymous wrote:She had a penis, tons of body hair and you basically walk around naked in spa world. WTF would you do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're family oriented. I would not want my 4 yo changing in the same room as a men. My child is too young to understand transgenderism. I have nothing against them but please keep it private. Literally.
I completely agree with their position.
Why are you trying to protect your kid from the world she will eventually have to live in? The earlier you can expose her to different lifestyles, the earlier she can embrace them without fear or stigma.
4 years of age is way too young to understand transgenderism. how would you explain your child that transgender person is allowed in the girls room but her dad and her brother are not?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're family oriented. I would not want my 4 yo changing in the same room as a men. My child is too young to understand transgenderism. I have nothing against them but please keep it private. Literally.
I completely agree with their position.
Why are you trying to protect your kid from the world she will eventually have to live in? The earlier you can expose her to different lifestyles, the earlier she can embrace them without fear or stigma.
Anonymous wrote:Getbreal that's not what I said at all. I said I didn't care but everyone shouldn't be forced to have the same comfort level.
Anonymous wrote:I think not allowing gays is wrong but I can understand the transgender part. Personally I wouldn't mind a transgendered person in the locker room (had it happen recently...or so I thought. She made a call and definitely had a woman's voice, but genuinely looked like a man dressed as a woman) however not everyone is comfortably with that not should everyone be forced to be comfortable with that.